Need quick fact check, please.

  • Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date
In summary, the atoms in our bodies were created in the early universe and were later formed into a variety of elements through fusion in ancient dying stars. While some elements may have originated directly from the Big Bang, the majority of elements heavier than helium were created through supernovas. However, it is also possible that our atoms could have been formed from nuclear waste.
  • #1
Holocene
237
0
Every atom in our body, was once contained with an ancient, dying star.

No?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes.
 
  • #3
waht said:
Yes.

Thanks. I had thought so, as I remember reading about neucleosynthesis.

Just checking, as I'm making a short video.
 
  • #4
Our atoms began as hydrogen atoms until they were fused together to form an entire periodic table of elements in a supernova explosion billions of years ago. Cool heh.
 
  • #5
Hydrogen was created in the early universe along with helium (although almost all helium on Earth is the result of alpha particles from radiaoctivity)

Everything lighter than about potassium was created in the early generation of stars, anything heavier was created by a supernova.
Although only iron and heavier NEEDS a supernova to be produced most early stars were pretty metal poor and so a lot of lighter metals actually originated in SN.
 
  • #6
Holocene said:
Every atom in our body, was once contained with an ancient, dying star.

No?

In principle, no. In practice, probably yes.

It is not guaranteed that the Hydrogen and Helium in your body was part of a star; it could have been formed directly from the aftermath of the BB.
 
  • #7
waht said:
Our atoms began as hydrogen atoms until they were fused together to form an entire periodic table of elements in a supernova explosion billions of years ago. Cool heh.

There is also the less romantic view that we are compiled from nuclear waste; mere byproducts of stellar fusion...:cry:
 

1. What is the importance of fact checking in science?

Fact checking is crucial in science as it ensures that information presented is accurate and supported by evidence. This helps to maintain the credibility and integrity of scientific research and findings.

2. How can I fact check a scientific claim?

To fact check a scientific claim, it is important to evaluate the source of the information, check for supporting evidence, and look for any biases or conflicts of interest. It is also helpful to consult multiple sources and experts in the field.

3. What are some common red flags to look for when fact checking?

Some common red flags to look for when fact checking include lack of credible sources, use of emotionally charged language, and unsupported or exaggerated claims. It is also important to consider the expertise and qualifications of the source.

4. Can fact checking be biased?

While fact checking itself is meant to be impartial and based on evidence, biases can still exist. It is important to be aware of personal biases and try to approach fact checking objectively, using multiple sources and perspectives.

5. Is fact checking only necessary for scientific information?

No, fact checking is important in all areas where information is presented as factual. This includes news articles, social media posts, and even everyday conversations. It is always important to verify information before accepting it as true.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
412
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
4
Views
805
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top