Special relativity and quantum mech

In summary, the conversation discusses the existence of an atom in two states, the ground state and the excited state, as well as the absorption of a photon to transition from the ground state to the excited state. The question at hand is what the photon frequency would be in the lab frame of reference, where the atom is initially at rest. A simple energy equation is used to solve for the photon frequency, but there is a question about whether the recoil of the excited atom should be taken into account. The formula for this is discussed and it is determined that including recoil would only result in a small change in the required photon energy.
  • #1
bs vasanth
16
1
An atom can exist in two states , ground state of M and excited state of mass M+Δ , it goes to excited state by absorption of an photon, what is the photon frequency in the in the lab frame of reference ( where the atom is initially at rest )?

A simple energy equation gives the answer:
E=( M+Δ -M)[itex]c^{2}[/itex]=hγ
γ=Δ[itex]c^{2}[/itex]/h
But my intuition says that I am overlooking something and can't be that simple..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bs vasanth said:
An atom can exist in two states , ground state of M and excited state of mass M+Δ , it goes to excited state by absorption of an photon, what is the photon frequency in the in the lab frame of reference ( where the atom is initially at rest )?

A simple energy equation gives the answer:
E=( M+Δ -M)[itex]c^{2}[/itex]=hγ
γ=Δ[itex]c^{2}[/itex]/h
But my intuition says that I am overlooking something and can't be that simple..

It is that simple.
 
  • #3
You should include the recoil of the excited atom in the final state.
Use Energy^2=(M+K)^2=(M+Delta)^2+K^2, and solve for K (the photon energy). (with c=1)
 
  • #4
Meir Achuz said:
You should include the recoil of the excited atom in the final state.
Use Energy^2=(M+K)^2=(M+Delta)^2+K^2, and solve for K (the photon energy). (with c=1)

Yes, I ignored recoil because its contribution is small for common cases. I, of course, agree with the above formula. Note that even for as extreme a case as a 10 Mev delta for a hydrogen atom, including recoil only changes the required photon energy to about 10.05 Mev. For Sodium, to about 10.002 Mev. For delta of 1 Mev and hydrogen, including recoil would require a 1.0005 Mev photon.
 
  • #5


I can confirm that your intuition is correct. While the equation you have provided is correct, it does not take into account the principles of special relativity and quantum mechanics. In order to accurately calculate the photon frequency in the lab frame of reference, we must consider the relativistic effects on the energy and momentum of both the atom and the photon.

In special relativity, the energy and momentum of a particle are not independent quantities, but are related through the famous equation E=mc^2. This means that the energy of a particle is not just its rest mass, but also includes its kinetic energy. In the case of the atom, when it absorbs a photon and transitions to the excited state, it gains a certain amount of kinetic energy. This change in energy must be taken into account when calculating the photon frequency.

In addition, quantum mechanics tells us that particles can exist in a state of superposition, meaning they can be in multiple states at the same time. This is true for the atom in this scenario, which can exist in both the ground and excited states simultaneously. This adds another layer of complexity to the calculations and requires us to use the principles of quantum mechanics to accurately determine the photon frequency.

Therefore, while your initial equation may give a rough estimate of the photon frequency, a more accurate calculation must take into account the principles of special relativity and quantum mechanics. This highlights the importance of considering multiple perspectives and theories when approaching scientific problems.
 

1. What is the difference between special relativity and quantum mechanics?

Special relativity is a theory that describes how objects move and interact in the absence of gravity, while quantum mechanics is a theory that describes the behavior of particles on a very small scale.

2. How do special relativity and quantum mechanics relate to each other?

Special relativity and quantum mechanics are two distinct theories that have been successful in explaining different phenomena. However, they are not compatible with each other and do not provide a unified description of the universe.

3. Can special relativity be applied to the quantum world?

No, special relativity is based on the assumption that space and time are absolute and continuous, while quantum mechanics suggests that they are relative and probabilistic. Therefore, special relativity cannot be directly applied to the quantum world.

4. What is the significance of the speed of light in special relativity and quantum mechanics?

The speed of light is a fundamental constant in both special relativity and quantum mechanics. It is the maximum speed at which any object or information can travel in the universe, and it plays a crucial role in the laws and equations of both theories.

5. Are there any experiments that have tested the compatibility of special relativity and quantum mechanics?

Yes, there have been several experiments conducted to test the compatibility of special relativity and quantum mechanics. However, so far, no experiment has been able to provide a definitive answer, and the search for a unified theory that can explain both theories continues.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
784
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top