Duck on a pound VS Cherenkov radiaton cone

In summary, the "Duck on a pound" experiment involves placing a rubber duck in a water tank or pond and subjecting it to different types of radiation to study its effects on living organisms. This experiment is related to Cherenkov radiation cone, a type of electromagnetic radiation used in particle physics experiments. Scientists have learned about the effects of Cherenkov radiation cone on living organisms through this experiment. However, there are ethical concerns regarding subjecting a live organism to potentially harmful radiation, but strict regulations and ethical guidelines are in place to ensure the safety and well-being of the duck during the experiment.
  • #1
tresgog
4
0
Here are two pages showing examples of the Cherenkov radiation:
http://physics.syr.edu/hep/rich.html
http://www.iss.infn.it/webg3/cebaf/hadron.html

I don't understant why the cone is ahead of the particule path.

I thought that the cone of light formed behing the particule path (like the v shaped shoc wave behind a duck)

Can somebody clear this up for me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The cone shows where the light ends up, not where it is produced.
 
  • #3


Both the duck on a pond and Cherenkov radiation cone are visual representations of wave phenomena. However, they are completely different phenomena with different underlying principles.

The duck on a pond is a classic example of wave interference, where the waves created by the duck's movements interact with each other to form a pattern of crests and troughs. The duck itself is not moving at a high enough speed to create any significant disturbance in the water, so the wave pattern remains relatively stationary.

On the other hand, Cherenkov radiation is a result of a charged particle moving through a medium at a high speed, faster than the speed of light in that medium. This creates a shockwave of sorts, with the particle leaving a trail of electromagnetic radiation in its wake. The cone shape is a result of the angle at which the radiation is emitted, which is dependent on the velocity of the particle.

The reason the cone appears to be ahead of the particle's path is due to the way the radiation is emitted. The radiation is emitted at a fixed angle relative to the particle's direction of motion, so as the particle moves forward, the radiation is continuously being emitted at that fixed angle. This creates the appearance that the cone is ahead of the particle, when in reality, it is just the angle of the radiation that gives that impression.

In summary, the duck on a pond and Cherenkov radiation cone are two very different phenomena with different underlying principles. While they both involve wave phenomena, they are caused by completely different mechanisms and should not be compared or confused with each other.
 

1. What is a "Duck on a pound"?

A "Duck on a pound" is a term used to describe an experiment in which a rubber duck is placed in a water tank or pond and subjected to different types of radiation to study its effects on the duck.

2. What is Cherenkov radiation cone?

Cherenkov radiation cone is a type of electromagnetic radiation that is emitted when a charged particle travels through a medium at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium. It appears as a cone-shaped glow, similar to a sonic boom, and is used in particle physics experiments to detect high-energy particles.

3. How does the "Duck on a pound" experiment relate to Cherenkov radiation cone?

The "Duck on a pound" experiment can be used to study the effects of Cherenkov radiation cone on living organisms. By subjecting the rubber duck to different types of radiation, scientists can observe how the duck reacts and what effects the radiation has on its body.

4. What have scientists learned from the "Duck on a pound" experiment in relation to Cherenkov radiation cone?

Through the "Duck on a pound" experiment, scientists have been able to observe the effects of Cherenkov radiation cone on living organisms and have gained a better understanding of how high-energy particles interact with matter. This knowledge can be applied to various fields, such as medicine and nuclear energy research.

5. Are there any ethical concerns with the "Duck on a pound" experiment?

Yes, there are ethical concerns with the "Duck on a pound" experiment as it involves subjecting a live organism to potentially harmful radiation. However, strict regulations and ethical guidelines are in place to ensure the safety and well-being of the duck during the experiment.

Similar threads

Two Unrelated Questions about GR: Light Cones and VS Dust
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
3K
Cherenkov Radiation for lighting
    • Thermodynamics
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top