Classical Electrodynamics and Relativity: The Lorentz-Dirac Equation

In summary, there are still unresolved issues regarding the behavior of charged particles in classical electrodynamics and general relativity. In CEM, a charged particle can experience a force from its own electromagnetic field, but this calculation is difficult due to conceptual difficulties. In general relativity, a point particle cannot even exist due to the lack of a solution to Einstein's equation for a point-particle stress-energy tensor. However, in many approximations, the self-field does not contribute to the motion. Reference can be found in textbooks and papers, but they may be complicated to understand.
  • #1
quantum123
306
1
1) In classical electrodynamics, does a charged particle experience any force exerted by the electromagnetic field it creates itself?

2) In general relativity, does the world-line of a lonely point mass obey the spacetime curvature created by the stress energy tensor created by the point mass?

3) In general relativity, in a system of 2 point masses, does the world-line of point mass A obey the spacetime curvature created by the stress energy tensor created by A or does the world-line of point mass A obey the spacetime curvature created by the stress energy tensor created by both particle A and particle B?

4) In a gas of N particles of point masses, does all the world-lines of all the point masses obey the spacetime curvature created by the stress energy tensor created by the N point masses or N-1 point masses?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1) In CEM, a charged particle does experience a force due to its own EM field if it is accelerating, but the calculation of this force is still unsolved due to infinite behavior at the location of the charge and other conceptual difficulties.
 
  • #3
1) Yes.

2) There is no solution to Einstein's equation for a point-particle stress-energy tensor. So such a particle cannot even exist. Only extended bodies or black hole-type objects are allowed in general relativity. Reasonably-speaking, this same restriction should be made for every classical field theory. Doing so solves many problems, including Meir's claim that there are conceptual difficulties in flat-spacetime EM.

In general, objects always respond to the physically-measurable field. They don't know the difference between what they've produced versus what has been produced by other sources. Still, it's well-known that in many approximations, the self-field does not contribute to the motion. It never contributes if Newton's 3rd law were exactly true. But of course it isn't in relativistic field theories, so you get nonzero self-forces in extreme situations.
 
  • #4
Stingray said:
1) Yes.
Can you give a reference to a textbook or a paper showing explicitly an example of such an effect? I would be interested in seeing this.

Thanks
 
  • #5
nrqed said:
Can you give a reference to a textbook or a paper showing explicitly an example of such an effect? I would be interested in seeing this.

That depends on the level you want to see it at (and your background). The last chapter of Jackson talks about this a bit. Here's a quick writeup intended to teach the Lorentz-Dirac equation, which is the name of the equation that a charged "point particle" should satisfy: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9912045" .

I much prefer the viewpoint that classical charges are fundamentally extended objects, but deriving the equations of motion correctly is then much more complicated. There exist relevant references, but they're not easy to read.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Classical Electrodynamics and Relativity: The Lorentz-Dirac Equation

1. What is the Classical Fields Problem?

The Classical Fields Problem, also known as the Field Theory Problem, is a fundamental question in physics that seeks to understand how particles and fields interact in the universe. It asks how fields, which are continuous, can give rise to discrete particles and their interactions.

2. What is the significance of the Classical Fields Problem?

The Classical Fields Problem is significant because it serves as the foundation for understanding the interactions between matter and energy in the universe. It has led to the development of modern field theories, such as quantum field theory, which are essential for our understanding of the fundamental forces and particles in nature.

3. What is the difference between classical and quantum fields?

Classical fields are described by classical mechanics, which is based on Newton's laws of motion and treats particles as point-like objects. On the other hand, quantum fields are described by quantum mechanics, which considers particles as waves and incorporates the principles of uncertainty and superposition. Quantum field theory is necessary for describing the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level.

4. What are some examples of classical fields?

Some examples of classical fields include the electromagnetic field, gravitational field, and scalar fields. The electromagnetic field is responsible for the interactions between electrically charged particles, while the gravitational field is responsible for the interactions between massive objects. Scalar fields, on the other hand, are used to describe the properties of particles, such as mass and charge.

5. How does the Classical Fields Problem relate to the search for a theory of everything?

The Classical Fields Problem is an essential aspect of the search for a theory of everything, which seeks to unify all fundamental forces and particles in a single framework. By understanding how fields give rise to particles and their interactions, scientists hope to develop a complete and consistent theory that can explain all physical phenomena in the universe.

Similar threads

Back
Top