Effect of sample size when using periodic boundary conditions in 2D Ising model

by DavidwN
Tags: ferromagnetism, ising, monte carlo
DavidwN is offline
Mar26-12, 08:34 AM
P: 1

I'm currently using the Monte Carlo Metropolis algorithm to investigate the 2D Ising model.

I have an NxN lattice of points with periodic boundary conditions imposed. I was wondering if anyone could explain why the sharpness of the phase transition is affected by the size of N?
I.e. if N is small I get a slow transition and as N is increased, the transition approaches a step function.

I don't understand why this is as I am only considering nearest neighbour interactions and by using periodic boundary conditions surely I am effectively modelling an infinite lattice? So why does the size of the unit cell affect my results?

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
How do liquid foams block sound?
When things get glassy, molecules go fractal
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
M Quack
M Quack is offline
Mar26-12, 10:57 AM
P: 640
You are experiencing critical opalescence. As you approach the phase transition, the correlation length increases exponentially. When this domain size reaches the size of your simulation, then the simulation breaks down, i.e. does not describe the physics correctly anymore.


Try and find a definition of the correlation length and calculated that on your grid. Then compare the temperature dependence for different grid sizes to what one would expect for an infinite lattice.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
crystal model with periodic boundary conditions Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
Periodic Boundary Conditions on non sq lattice Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1
Free Electron Model: Why periodic boundary conditions and what is "L"? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Momentum eigenfunctions with periodic boundary conditions Advanced Physics Homework 0
periodic boundary conditions Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 16