Why planets are "spheres"


by jldibble
Tags: gravity, planets, space, sphere, spheres
jldibble
jldibble is offline
#1
Jan18-14, 08:47 PM
P: 43
I was reading the specifics on why large bodies in space, such as planets, are pulled into spherical shape and they had a very technical term for the process.

Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Unique pair of supermassive black holes in an ordinary galaxy discovered
Red stars and big bulges: How black holes shape galaxies
Image: X-raying the cosmos
Chronos
Chronos is offline
#2
Jan18-14, 09:09 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,183
Gravity is the short answer. A sphere produces maximum volume with the least possible surface area. A planet forms via accretion. Small particles clump together, most likely by electrostatic attraction. As the clump grows gravity takes charge. Gravity is an equal opportunity employer and each particle attracted tries to get as close to the center of gravity as possible. This forces the planet to become spherical over time. The high spots eventually migrate into the lowest available spots. A certain amount of oblateness is present in all planets due to centrifugal force.
jldibble
jldibble is offline
#3
Jan19-14, 10:50 AM
P: 43
I understand the forces at work when it comes to the shape. I'm just trying to track down the term that was used that I can't seem to find.

I believe term was three words and was something along the lines of "gravitational ____________ __________"

I apologize that I can't be more descriptive on what I'm looking for.

DrClaude
DrClaude is offline
#4
Jan19-14, 02:05 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
DrClaude's Avatar
P: 1,111

Why planets are "spheres"


Isostatic adjustment? http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-planets-round
jldibble
jldibble is offline
#5
Jan19-14, 06:11 PM
P: 43
That's it! Thanks
tinypositrons
tinypositrons is offline
#6
Jan26-14, 05:50 PM
P: 28
They aren't all spheres. Jupiter is significantly wider at the equator than pole to pole. Look at Haumea, a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt. It has a highly ecliptic shape!
Superm3
Superm3 is offline
#7
Jan26-14, 06:25 PM
P: 3
I know there's an equation to find out how much an object shifts from being a true sphere. I forgot it though :(
Phoenix59
Phoenix59 is offline
#8
Feb28-14, 10:29 PM
Phoenix59's Avatar
P: 5
Well, Jupiter would be a sphere but the force of its rotation causes the oblateness. That's going to be true of any rotating sphere, even a relatively solid one such as the earth.
metapuff
metapuff is offline
#9
Mar4-14, 08:12 PM
P: 10
In addition, the fact that a spherical shape minimizes surface area is key when it comes to understanding planet formation. Planets are more easily formed when there are a bunch of ice particles floating around (they accrete material more easily), so minimizing surface area minimizes exposure to sunlight, which minimizes the amount of ice that gets melted, which makes it easier for the planet to from. But yeah, gravitational compression is going to be the main cause for anything larger than a few tens of kilometers in radius.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Suggestion "Linking to "crank" or "crackpot" sites is prohibited.", discussion. Forum Feedback & Announcements 10
"Determine the relative distances of each of the planets from the Sun given [...]." Introductory Physics Homework 19
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
"Symphonies of Planets" - Underlying Data Astrophysics 0
Call them DOLPHINS (not "dwarf planets") General Astronomy 3