How many lumens is required for this?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoobyshoe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the number of lumens required for a light source to be visible to the unaided human eye at a distance of 70 miles. Participants explore the implications of light intensity, efficiency, and the physiological aspects of human vision, while considering various factors that influence visibility.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that lumens are a physiological quantity dependent on eye sensitivity and suggest that wavelength must be considered.
  • There is a discussion about the need for a non-physiological scale of measurement, with references to candle-power and candela.
  • Participants emphasize that without information on how the light is produced and its efficiency, it is difficult to determine the required power.
  • One participant proposes a method to estimate the minimum energy required by making several assumptions about the light's properties and the human eye's response.
  • Another participant provides a formula for calculating intensity based on the distance from the source, suggesting that equal distribution of light can be modeled mathematically.
  • There is mention of specific examples, such as the visibility of a 2 W output red laser and high-output lamps, to illustrate the practical aspects of visibility at long distances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors influencing the calculation of lumens and the visibility of light at a distance. While some agree on the importance of efficiency and wavelength, others highlight the challenges in making definitive calculations without specific data. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact lumens required.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their calculations due to missing assumptions and the dependence on various factors such as light source efficiency and atmospheric conditions.

zoobyshoe
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
1,255
A light is visible to the unaided human eye at a distance of 70 miles. How many lumens is required for this?Stipulating the light is equally bright in all directions, can we calculate from the above lumens a reliable estimate of the joules needed to produce a light of that strength?

-zoob
 
Science news on Phys.org
Lumen is a fysiological quantity. That means it's defined by the eye-sensitivity. Therefore, you'd need to include the wavelength of the light.

For the energy required to produce the light: you'd have to include how the light was made and what the efficiency of the process was.
 
Originally posted by suyver
Lumen is a fysiological quantity. That means it's defined by the eye-sensitivity. Therefore, you'd need to include the wavelength of the light.
What's the non-physiological scale of measurement I need here, then, candle-power?
For the energy required to produce the light: you'd have to include how the light was made and what the efficiency of the process was.
Don't have that info.

Thank you.
 
Originally posted by zoobyshoe
What's the non-physiological scale of measurement I need here, then, candle-power?

That would be the candela.

Originally posted by zoobyshoe
Don't have that info.

Then you really cannot say anything about the required power. For example: consider the electroluminescence of silicon and the thermal (black-body) radiation of a metal at about 1000 K: there is a factor of ~1,000,000 in power required to obtain equal brightness...
 
Originally posted by suyver
Then you really cannot say anything about the required power. For example: consider the electroluminescence of silicon and the thermal (black-body) radiation of a metal at about 1000 K: there is a factor of ~1,000,000 in power required to obtain equal brightness...
Thanks, suyver.

This, then, is the wrong tree, and I must go bark elsewhere.
 


Originally posted by zoobyshoe
A light is visible to the unaided human eye at a distance of 70 miles. How many lumens is required for this?


Stipulating the light is equally bright in all directions, can we calculate from the above lumens a reliable estimate of the joules needed to produce a light of that strength?

-zoob
If you turned the question around, you can get an estimate of the minimum amount of energy required (actually power, since you didn't say how long the light was visible for).

A sample calculation:
- assume the light is 'red', say 650 nm
- assume the human eye has a quantum efficiency of 5% (only 1 in 20 photons incident on the eyeball result in the firing of a neuron)
- assume the extinction of a column of 70 miles of air is x% (of the red photons which are emitted, only 1-x reach the eyeball)
- assume the human threshold for detection is [see below]
- assume the source can turn input energy into red photons with 100% efficiency
- assume the light is tightly collimated, and spreads to a circle of radius 7cm at distance 70 miles (in other words, hits both eyeballs, and surrounding part of the face, but not much else)

... just plug in the numbers, with the appropriate formulae, and the answer will fall out. You can then modify the assumptions to suit whatever case you're interested in investigating (isotropic emission, solar-spectrum light source, eyes which aren't dark adapted, ...).

I've only a dimly remembered 'rule of thumb' that can get you to the human eye threshhold: at the top of the atmosphere, the number of photons from a zero magnitude star with an A spectrum is 10,000 per square cm per angstrom per second (probably V or B band). More reliably, the visual threshold of the fully dark-adapted human eye (under truly dark skies) is 6.5 mag. If my 'A star' number is more or less correct, it's quite straightforward to calculate the number of photons, across the visible spectrum, that an eyeball needs to receive before the brain perceives a light.

Oh, if your source isn't a 'point', there are several effects which will need to be added to the above calculations.

Does this help?
 
That's exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. I was certain there had to be ways to derive meaningful information from the fact of a light visible to the unaided eye at this distance. Your method of attacking the minimm required is really what I was hoping for. Thanks much.
 
However, this lower limit will be very low indeed. Example: a 2 W output red laser (input: ~250 W) will be easily visible at 70 miles if there is no smog in the air.

Even in the non-columated case, a ~few kW halogen / xenon lamp (such as those used in IMAX theaters) will be visible over this distance under clear conditions. Just think about lighthouses...

By the way: if you want to assume equal distribution of the light in all directions, then you can simply use the following:

[tex]I(r)=\frac{I_0}{4\pi r^2}[/tex]

where [tex]I(r)[/tex] denotes the intensity at distance [tex]r[/tex] from the source, if the source has an intensity [tex]I_0[/tex].

Cheers,
Freek Suyver.
 
Originally posted by suyver
However, this lower limit will be very low indeed.
Point taken.

Thanks for the formula. That will be needed.

-Zoob
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K