New Forum for Analytical Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
Creating a dedicated forum for analytical mechanics, focusing on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics, is being considered. Participants suggest that General Physics could serve as an appropriate venue for such discussions. However, specific applications might be better suited for specialized forums, like those for Quantum mechanics. The need for a dedicated space reflects a desire for more focused discussions on these advanced topics. Overall, the idea of a new forum is met with interest, highlighting the importance of organized discussions in analytical mechanics.
Arcon
I was wondering what people thought about the notion of creating a forum for analytical mechanics, i.e. Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics. If not then what forum would you recommend discussing the subject?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think here, In General Physics, would be a good spot, unless it is a specific application which would go in a different forum, i.e. Quantum.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why is it Impossible to Solve the Three Body Problem Analytically?
Replies
6
Views
5K
Analytical Mechanics: Regularity Conditions on Constraint Surface
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Noether's theorem for point particles
Replies
3
Views
1K
Can analytical mechanics be deduced from Newtonian mechanics?
Replies
22
Views
2K
Hamiltonian Mechanics: why paths in state space never cross each other
Replies
9
Views
2K
Is there an English translation of Jacobi's work on mechanics?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Prerequisites needed to grasp analytical mechanics.
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Newtonian path of light in a gravitational field
Replies
8
Views
1K
Difference between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Mechanics
Replies
20
Views
10K
Koopman–von Neumann mechanics references
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top