Can Logarithms Simplify Exponential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PrudensOptimus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation 3^x - 3^(x-1) = 1000 using logarithmic properties. The transformation of the equation reveals that it can be factored into (3^(x-1))(3-1) = 1000, simplifying to 3^(x-1) = 500. By applying logarithms, the solution for x is derived as x = [log(500)/log(3)] + 1. The thread also touches on the general property of exponents, N^m - N^(m-1) = (N^(m-1))(N-1), to further clarify the approach. Overall, the discussion illustrates effective methods for simplifying exponential equations using logarithms.
PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
IS there a way to find x if given:

3^x - 3^(x-1) = 1000


I tried to take log [3^x - 3^(x-1)]/log[3] = log1000/log3

but then, x-x-1 = ...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
well, I've never done logarithms really, but I figured out how to do this


to break it down it goes like this

(3*3*3*3...*3*3) - (3*3*3*3..*3) = 1000

so therefore 1 less 3 is multiplied in the second part...heres a simple example so you can see the pattern

(5*5*5*5) - (5*5*5) = (5*5*5)*(5-1)

therefore we can say in general that this means

N^m - N^(m-1) = (N^(m-1))*(N-1)

now instead of the left side of the equation above, we use the right side, and solve for x

(3^(x-1))*(3-1) = 1000
3^(x-1) = 1000/(3-1)
3^(x-1) = 500
log (3^(x-1)) = log (500)
(x-1)(log 3) = log (500)
x-1 = log (500)/log (3)
x = [log (500)/log (3)] + 1

and voila, you have x...

another way of looking at this is that since you are subtracting something with one less *3, then 3^x : 3^(x-1) is 3:1. 3-1=2, so 2:1000. This means that 3:1500 and 1:500. Therefore 3^x = 1500 and x^(x-1) = 500

I hope this helps
 
You can use the properties of exponents to factor your inital expression.

3^x - 3^{(x-1)}=1000
3^x -3^x 3^{-1}=1000
3^x(1 - 3^{-1})=1000
3^x= 1500
ln(3^x)= ln 1500
x ln 3= ln 1500
x = \frac {ln 1500} {ln 3}

I'll leave it to the reader to show that the 2 results are the same.
 
another solution:
instead of factoring 3^x, factor out 3^x-1
(3^x)-{3(x-1)}=1000
{3^(x-1)}[3-1]=1000
{3^(x-1)}2=1000
{3^(x-1)}=500
log{3^(x-1)}=log(500)
(x-1)log3=log500
x=[(log500)/(log3)]+1
 
Warr said:
well, I've never done logarithms really, but I figured out how to do this


to break it down it goes like this

(3*3*3*3...*3*3) - (3*3*3*3..*3) = 1000

so therefore 1 less 3 is multiplied in the second part...heres a simple example so you can see the pattern

(5*5*5*5) - (5*5*5) = (5*5*5)*(5-1)

therefore we can say in general that this means

N^m - N^(m-1) = (N^(m-1))*(N-1)

now instead of the left side of the equation above, we use the right side, and solve for x

(3^(x-1))*(3-1) = 1000
3^(x-1) = 1000/(3-1)
3^(x-1) = 500
log (3^(x-1)) = log (500)
(x-1)(log 3) = log (500)
x-1 = log (500)/log (3)
x = [log (500)/log (3)] + 1

and voila, you have x...

another way of looking at this is that since you are subtracting something with one less *3, then 3^x : 3^(x-1) is 3:1. 3-1=2, so 2:1000. This means that 3:1500 and 1:500. Therefore 3^x = 1500 and x^(x-1) = 500

I hope this helps
How can I understand the logarithms requirements in flowcharts? Easily please, I am mad about a situation with a proffesor.
 
evagriselda said:
How can I understand the logarithms requirements in flowcharts? Easily please, I am mad about a situation with a proffesor.
u mean something like

log (a*b) = log a + log b?

they are called Log Rules or Log Properties.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top