How Can You Optimize a Trebuchet for Maximum Range?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltronzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trebuchet
AI Thread Summary
To optimize a trebuchet for maximum range, key parameters include the projectile weight, counterweight, beam length, and support height. The separation angle, where the normal force equals zero, is crucial for determining the projectile's launch conditions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of energy conservation and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the system. Questions arise regarding the role of time in calculations, the structure of kinetic energy equations, and the consideration of angular acceleration at the moment of projectile release. Understanding these dynamics is essential for achieving optimal performance in trebuchet design.
deltronzero
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello everyone, I'm new here and i have a few questions about the parameters of a trebuchet. sorry for such a long post.

with a simple see saw trebuchet I'm given the projectile weight and counterweight, the length and mass density of the beam, and the height of the support. i am supposed to find the optimal distance of the counterweight to the pivot and the optimal starting angle that gives the longest range when the projectile is released. first I'm supposed to find the angle made when the projectile separates from the beam (when normal force with the beam equals zero) and with that I'm supposed to find the angular velocity at the time of separation. all energy is conserved and i can ignore friction, damping, and wind.

i've calculated the inertia for the whole system along with the initial torque and I've attempted to come up with an equation which equates the final kinetic energy with the change in potential energies.

here are my questions:

a) is there any way to solve for this problem without involving time?

b) for the total final kinetic energy, would this be Iw^2 + mp*a*(distance to pivot)? with w being the final velocity taken around the pivot, mp being the mass of the projectile, and a being its acceleration? i understand that the whole system has translational motion, not just the projectile, but i don't know how to structure this.

c) in order to find the angle where the projectile is launched (normal force with beam = 0), am i to assume that at this instance there is no angular acceleration? if there is no angular acceleration at this point, the angular acceleration would have been decreasing, how do this factor in?

d) when summing moments around the pivot, do i take into account the normal forces made by the counterweight and projectile? currently I've only included the two weights and the weight of the beam.

the most important question is solving for the separation angle, I'm very confused by this. once i have an equation for that, i think everything else will fall into place.



thank you for your time, i know this post is long and this looks bad as a first post but I'm in desperate need of help. any and all help is appreciated. thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it will break away when static friction is overcome. It is needed in order to give the projectile the necessary centripetal acceleration while it is accelerated tangentially by the beam. One component of the weight assists also to keep it on the beam. Even if the beam is not accelerating the system will rotate at a constant speed if friction at the pivot is ignored. So there is no reason for the projectile to leave the system unless it falls off under the influence of gravity due to the beam rotating too slow. Is there an outside shoulder for the projectile to keep it on the beam?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top