Photons Perceive Universe as 2D: A Curious State?

Click For Summary
From a photon's perspective, the universe appears to contract to zero length in the direction of travel due to Lorentz contraction, as its speed equals the speed of light. Additionally, time dilation indicates that any time experienced by an observer corresponds to zero time for the photon, suggesting a timeless existence. This leads to the conclusion that a photon may perceive itself as stationary on a two-dimensional plane. The reasoning presented raises intriguing questions about the nature of time and space from a photon's viewpoint. Overall, this exploration of a photon's perception of the universe presents a curious state of affairs worth further discussion.
LHarriger
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I was trying to envision the universe from the standpoint of a photon and it seems that based on the Lorentz contraction:
L = L_{0}\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}
since u = c this implies that, from the photons point of view, the length of the universe in the photons direction of travel contracts to zero.
Moreover, based on time dialation
\bar{t} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}
since u = c any time t-bar measured by an observer will correspond to a zero time measurement by the photon.
Does all this mean that a photon observes itself as stuck timeless and stationary on a 2D sheet?
This just seems like a curious state of affairs and I was wondering if my reasoning was correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LHarriger said:
I was trying to envision the universe from the standpoint of a photon and it seems that based on the Lorentz contraction:
L = L_{0}\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}
since u = c this implies that, from the photons point of view, the length of the universe in the photons direction of travel contracts to zero.
Moreover, based on time dialation
\bar{t} = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}
since u = c any time t-bar measured by an observer will correspond to a zero time measurement by the photon.
Does all this mean that a photon observes itself as stuck timeless and stationary on a 2D sheet?
This just seems like a curious state of affairs and I was wondering if my reasoning was correct.
There was an earlier discussion on this topic: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=107741" already. Perhaps it answers your question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K