When Should You Use the Delta Symbol in Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The delta symbol is used in equations to denote changes in specific quantities, such as internal energy or temperature. It is essential to include deltas when calculating changes, as omitting them can lead to incorrect results unless the change is zero. For example, the change in internal energy is expressed as ΔU = (3/2)nRΔT, derived from the difference between final and initial states. In contrast, potential difference equations, like ΔV = Ed, reflect changes in potential, which are defined relative to arbitrary reference points. Understanding when to use delta symbols is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Okay, so how do you know when to put a delta symbol in front of a variable? For example, U=\frac{3}{2}nRT however, it can also be written as \Delta U=\frac{3}{2}nR\Delta T --Change in Internal energy of a system

I'm pretty sure that this isn't the case for many equations such as: \Delta V=Ed--Potential difference, where there is no delta signs on the right hand side of the equation right?

Are these deltas just suppose to be memorized or is there a way to add or remove them from equations while still being able to achieve the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you can't remove or add deltas to an equation, unless you happen to get really lucky and what you were subtracting happened to be zero. For example

\Delta U=\frac{3}{2}nR\Delta T

We know U=\frac{3}{2}nRT

So if we have intitial internal energy U_i and final internal energy U_f then U_f-U_i is by definition the change in internal energy. But U_f=\frac{3}{2}nRT_f where T_f is the final temperature (assuming the quantity of material does not change, and of course R can never change) and U_i=\frac{3}{2}nRT_i where T_i is the initial temperature. So U_f-U_i=\frac{3}{2}nRT_f-\frac{3}{2}nRT_i=\frac{3}{2}nR(T_f-T_i)
So the fact that you added delta symbols isn't mysterious, it's just basic algebra
 
Office_Shredder said:
No, you can't remove or add deltas to an equation, unless you happen to get really lucky and what you were subtracting happened to be zero. For example

\Delta U=\frac{3}{2}nR\Delta T

We know U=\frac{3}{2}nRT

So if we have intitial internal energy U_i and final internal energy U_f then U_f-U_i is by definition the change in internal energy. But U_f=\frac{3}{2}nRT_f where T_f is the final temperature (assuming the quantity of material does not change, and of course R can never change) and U_i=\frac{3}{2}nRT_i where T_i is the initial temperature. So U_f-U_i=\frac{3}{2}nRT_f-\frac{3}{2}nRT_i=\frac{3}{2}nR(T_f-T_i)
So the fact that you added delta symbols isn't mysterious, it's just basic algebra


Ohhh lol. What about the potential difference equation? How come there is a delta in front of the (V)?
 
There's no need to memorize anything.

If the quantity on the left hand side has a sensible definition on its own (like U in terms of T), then the change in that quantity would have to be expressed in terms of the change in the variable it depends on (T in this case).

Potential functions and potential energy functions are different, in the sense that the potential at a single point has a completely arbitrary definition (i.e., the reference point with respect to which you measure the potential could change, adding or subtracting a constant value to all potentials at all points). This doesn't matter, because the *difference* in potential between two points will remain the same regardless. This is what is given by Ed and what is physically relevant.

A good analogy is elevation. Let's say you're on an inclined plane (to keep the math simple). Then let's call the slope, or gradient of the incline E (it plays an analogous role to the electric field in this analogy). Let's call the distance you have traveled up the plane d. Then the total gain in elevation is just the slope times the horizontal distance:

\Delta h = Ed

But what are you measuring the elevations with respect to (i.e. where do you define h = 0 to be)? It could be relative to sea level (as is the case in real life), or it could be relative to where you are standing now (in which case sea level would have a negative elevation). The point is, it really doesn't matter. It doesn't affect the change in elevation \Delta h [/tex] between two points on the incline separated by distance d. That will always be given by Ed. So if all you are concerned with is your gain in elevation with horizontal distance travelled, then this will be your formula of interest.
 
Last edited:
Voltage, like gravitational potential, is in reference to an arbitrary zero point. You can think of the change in voltage in a uniform electric field as the field times the change in distance. But were usually only concerned with the relative change in potential between 2 points
 
AznBoi said:
Ohhh lol. What about the potential *difference* equation? How come there is a delta in front of the (V)?


The answer to your question lies in the question itself. The potential difference is (not surprisingly) the difference in electric potential.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top