Uncovering the Metric Sign in Einstein's Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter blumfeld0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Sign
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hi.
1. Why does the sign of the metric have to be (+,-,-,-) or (-,+,+,+)?
meaning why does the sign in front of the time part of the metric have to be different than the signs in front of the spatial part of the metric?
is there a good answer for this question other than it gives the right answer.

2. are the signs something that just pop out after solving the Einstein Equations for various scenarios and doing the math or is it put there ad hoc?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einstein derived from a few postulates (most notably that the speed of light is constant in any inertial coordinate system) and logical reasoning the coordinate transformations between two inertial coordinate systems (also known as Lorentz transformations).

Minkowski was the one that realized those transformations conserve the following combination called spacetime interval:
ds^2 = dt^2 - (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2) (units of c=1)
That fixed the metric in SR to (+, -, -, -) or (-, +, +, +) depending on the sign convention. SR is GR of the flat Minkowski spacetime.

GR models spacetime mathematically with a Riemannian manifold. Every such manifold has the property of local flatness, i.e. the metric at any point in spacetime can be diagonalized with a suitable coordinate transformation. The resulting local diagonal metric is used by an observer at that spacetime point to measure events around him/her. GR postulates that the diagonalized metric at any point is the SR metric thus the signature of the metric in GR is imported from SR.

The bottom line is that the sign difference between dt^2 and dr^2 originates in the Einstein's SR postulate that light speed is the same in all inertial coordinate systems. If you have a light signal connecting two events separated by dt and dr then according to the SR postulate c=1=dr/dt in any innertial coordinate system. That leads to ds^2 = dt^2 - dr^2 = 0 =invariant (light travels along null paths) which is generalized to nonzero ds^2 for other possible paths not followed by light.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top