Free Falling Object question


by veloix
Tags: falling, free, object
veloix
veloix is offline
#1
Sep19-07, 12:16 AM
P: 46
[b]1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data[/
A ball is thrown directly downward, with an initial speed of 7.15 m/s, from a height of 31.0 m. After what time interval does the ball strike the ground?



2. Relevant equations
All the kinematics equations dealing with velocity and height and accelration. need to solve for time.



3. The attempt at a solution
I tried this one couple of times. The first thing I did was use the equation Yf=Yi+Viyt+1/2(a)t^2.

I chose the top to be postive.
0= 31.0m+ 7.15 m/s(t)+1/2(-9.80)t^2
I saw that this look like a qudratic equation so i work it out
ax+bx+cx
-7.15 m/s +/-[(-7.15-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
it came out to be
-7.15+7.53 = 0.38
-7.15-7.53= -14.68
i think im not doing something right, need some help with this one.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
Space-tested fluid flow concept advances infectious disease diagnoses
SpaceX launches supplies to space station (Update)
Mindscrape
Mindscrape is offline
#2
Sep19-07, 12:21 AM
P: 1,877
I didn't personally check it, but it seems fine. The ball would hit the ground within a couple seconds or so (approx sqrt(6)) if you just dropped it, so if you throw it down it will be even quicker, like the half a second you got.
learningphysics
learningphysics is offline
#3
Sep19-07, 12:22 AM
HW Helper
P: 4,125
Viy = -7.15m/s since it is thrown downward.

veloix
veloix is offline
#4
Sep19-07, 12:25 AM
P: 46

Free Falling Object question


oh ok i going compute this out then ty.
veloix
veloix is offline
#5
Sep19-07, 12:40 AM
P: 46
hmm its still not comeing out right i check my work but i keep getting the wrong anwser. I dont know what else i can do.
learningphysics
learningphysics is offline
#6
Sep19-07, 12:44 AM
HW Helper
P: 4,125
Quote Quote by veloix View Post
hmm its still not comeing out right i check my work but i keep getting the wrong anwser. I dont know what else i can do.
What time do you get?
veloix
veloix is offline
#7
Sep19-07, 12:47 AM
P: 46
when i caluclated everything t came out to be 15.34 if I chose the positve and -1.04 with the negative.
learningphysics
learningphysics is offline
#8
Sep19-07, 12:53 AM
HW Helper
P: 4,125
Quote Quote by veloix View Post
when i caluclated everything t came out to be 15.34 if I chose the positve and -1.04 with the negative.
can you show your calculations?
veloix
veloix is offline
#9
Sep19-07, 01:10 AM
P: 46
0= 31.0m + (-7.15 m/s)t + 1/2(-9.80 m/s^2)t^2
X= -(-7.15)+/-[-7.15^2-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-51.12-(-608)/-9.80]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[557/-9.80]^2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-56.8]^1/2 hmm i made a mistake with my signs man thse quads are tough hehe. i guess the solutions i got before dont reall exsit because of the negative rooot. hmmmm
learningphysics
learningphysics is offline
#10
Sep19-07, 01:16 AM
HW Helper
P: 4,125
Quote Quote by veloix View Post
0= 31.0m + (-7.15 m/s)t + 1/2(-9.80 m/s^2)t^2
X= -(-7.15)+/-[-7.15^2-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-51.12-(-608)/-9.80]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[557/-9.80]^2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-56.8]^1/2 hmm i made a mistake with my signs man thse quads are tough hehe. i guess the solutions i got before dont reall exsit because of the negative rooot. hmmmm
Hmmm... I don't think you're applying the quadratic equation properly. the /2a part doesn't go inside the square root... and you should have (-7.15)^2 = 51.12 not -7.15^2=-51.12
veloix
veloix is offline
#11
Sep19-07, 01:35 AM
P: 46
wow i was messing that up all kinds of ways i finally got the right anwser. thanks alot for your help you save me on endless path hehe. the right anwser was 1.89s using the positive side.
learningphysics
learningphysics is offline
#12
Sep19-07, 01:39 AM
HW Helper
P: 4,125
Quote Quote by veloix View Post
wow i was messing that up all kinds of ways i finally got the right anwser. thanks alot for your help you save me on endless path hehe. the right anwser was 1.89s using the positive side.
cool! no prob!
circuscircus
circuscircus is offline
#13
Sep19-07, 07:50 AM
P: 15


sometimes it helps to reduce error and make life easier to plug in the x = vi t + 1/2 at^2 formula into the quadratic equation first and simplify before plugging in the actual values... this approach makes life easier for some ppl


Register to reply

Related Discussions
[SOLVED] Acceleration of free falling object on another planet Introductory Physics Homework 9
help with free falling object problem Introductory Physics Homework 7
Free falling object Introductory Physics Homework 3
question on an object falling 10 m Introductory Physics Homework 13
Free Falling Object Introductory Physics Homework 6