Matrix Representation of S_z Using Eigenkets of S_y

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Show the matrix representation of S_z using the eigenkets of S_y as base vectors.

I'm not quite sure on the entire process but here's what i think:

We get the transformation matrix though:

U = \sum_k |b^{(k)} \rangle \langle a^{(k)} |

where |b> is the eigenket for S_y and <a| is the eigenket for S_z

this will give me a change of basis operator that i can operate on the S_z operator to get it into the S_y basis.

would this be the correct though process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine.

Note: |a> is an eigenket for S_z; <a| would be an eigenbra that is in dual correspondence with |a>.
 
I get:

U =\left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |+ \rangle \langle +| + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |- \rangle \langle +| \right) + \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |+ \rangle \langle -| - \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |- \rangle \langle -| \right)

U= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;1\\i&amp;-i\end{array}\right)

US_z=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{\hbar}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;1\\i&amp;-i\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right)

thus, S-z in S_y basis is:
S_z=\frac{\hbar\sqrt{2}}{4}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;-1\\i&amp;i\end{array}\right)

looks okay?
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top