Frame dragging effects on speed of light

carpodoubt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I had a question that I was hoping someone could answer for me.

If light passes next to a massive rotating object such as a black hole, would the affects of frame dragging cause a blue shift or would the light essentialy travel at a speed faster than the C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light cannot exceed the speed of light in a vacuum. It would be blue shifted.
 
Could you explain in detail why it would be blue shifted.
 
I think that's wrong. The light lensed from one side should certainly be brighter than the other (since the source is effectively "closer" in space-time from that side).

No, actually, that's too sloppy. There will be more light from one side, because the "closeness" will cause the source to subtend a bigger angle on that side.

But the colour-shifts (and hence also the surface brightnesses) will not be different between each side. If light frequencies were different, then the entire image would also be evolving at different rates on either side. So although you might initially see two images of the source at approximately the same point in the image's history, if you waited long enough then you would end up seeing simultaneous images of two arbitrarily separated points in the source's history. That will lead to a contradiction.

Note to the OP: It won't locally travel faster than c either, maybe it helps to think of there as being "less space" (and extra time) in that direction.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
226
Replies
42
Views
717
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top