What is the particle's distance from the origin

  • Thread starter Thread starter TonkaQD4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Origin
AI Thread Summary
The position of a particle is described by the equation r = (6.50 ihat + 3.10 jhat)t^2, and the distance from the origin at t_1 = 2.6 seconds is calculated to be 48.7 meters, while at t_2 = 6.2 seconds, it is 276.8 meters. To find the particle's speed, the derivative of the position vector r(t) must be taken, resulting in the velocity vector v(t) = (6.50 ihat + 3.10 jhat) * 2t. There was confusion regarding the differentiation process, with clarifications provided that the derivative remains a vector rather than a scalar. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying calculus to solve for speed and highlights the need for careful algebraic manipulation to avoid errors.
TonkaQD4
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
The position of a particle as a function of time is given by r = (6.50 ihat + 3.10 jhat)t^2 , where t is in seconds.

What is the particle's distance from the origin at t_1 = 2.6 seconds?
What is the particle's distance from the origin at t_2 = 6.2 seconds?

What is the particle's speed at t = 2.6 seconds?
What is the particle's speed at t = 6.2 seconds?

I know that at t = 0 seconds the particle is 0 meters away and has a speed of 0 m/.

How do I go about solving for the other questions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I figured out that the magnitude of the vector r = (6.5+3.1)t^2 meters is 7.20.

Therefore I solved t = 2.6s... 7.2 x 2.6^2 = 48.7 meters and t = 6.2 s... 7.2 x 6.2^2 = 276.8 meters.

But now I am not sure of how to solve for the particle's speed?

Any help would be great.

Thanks
 
TonkaQD4 said:
Well I figured out that the magnitude of the vector r = (6.5+3.1)t^2 meters is 7.20t^2[/color].
You forgot to write a t^2 after the number, but I think you did it correct as you get the correct answer.

In one dimension, if the position of the particle is given by x(t), the velocity is given by x'(t). The same is true for (in this case) two dimensions: the derivative of the vector r(t) will give you the velocity vector v(t) = r'(t).
 
So r'(t) = v(t)

I am not getting the right answer so maybe I am doing something wrong when taking the derivative..

r'(t) = 2(6.5+3.1)t or 19.2t Correct?
 
No, the derivative is again a vector. It's not a number. If r(t) = (x(t), y(t), z(t) in three dimensions, where x, y and z are just functions of t (the components of the vector), then r'(t) = (x'(t), y'(t), z'(t)) - the components are the derivatives of the original vector.
In this case r(t) = \left( 6.50 t^2 \hat \i + 3.10 t^2 \hat \j \right). The derivative is then
r&#039;(t) = \left( \frac{d}{dt} 6.50 t^2 \hat \i + \frac{d}{dt} 3.10 t^2 \hat \j \right)<br /> = \left( 2 \times 6.50 t \hat \i + 2 \times 3.10 t \hat \j \right),<br />
which you can write as
r&#039;(t) = (6.50 \hat \i + 3.10 \hat \j) 2 t.

I made the attached (very ugly!) image to show what I mean. The v(t) vector is supposed to be tangent to the black path of the object.
 

Attachments

  • path.jpg
    path.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 2,325
Last edited:
TonkaQD4, did you get the correct answer using that^ equation? If so what is it because I can't seem to get it.
 
Hi Becca.

Can you
a) not revive an old thread (the last post was almost 4 years ago)?
b) show some of your work? The answer is quite straightforward, so if you don't get it, it's most likely an algebraic error somewhere.
 
Back
Top