Instantaneous Veloctiy, kinda hard Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sucks@Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the instantaneous speed of a 2.00kg mass as it moves in a circular path with a changing radius due to the string winding around a rod. Participants emphasize the importance of conserving angular momentum while acknowledging that the problem's setup may not strictly adhere to this principle due to the angle of the string. The calculations involve using the moment of inertia and angular velocity, leading to confusion about the relationships between these variables and tangential speed. Ultimately, the correct approach involves re-evaluating the arithmetic and understanding that angular velocity is related to tangential speed through the radius. The final consensus confirms the correct instantaneous speed calculation after clarifying the relationships between the variables.
Sucks@Physics
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Initially, a 2.00kg mass is whirling at the end of a string in a circular path of .750 m on a horizontal frictionless surface with a tangential speed of 5 m/s. The string has been slowly winding around a vertical rod, and a few seconds later the length of the string has shortened to .250 m. What is the instantaneous speed of the mass at the moment the string reaches a length of .250m.

I = mr^2 but i must be missing a formula because that won't work because it would give me a smaller number and it obviously speeds up the shorter the string gets.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
angular momentum

What they undoubtedly want you to assume is that angular momentum is conserved. How do you compute the angular momentum of a point mass?

[Note well: Unfortunately, this problem is bogus since the string makes an angle with the radius as it wraps around the pole and angular momentum is not conserved. No work is done on the system so its speed cannot change. But I suggest that you ignore that inconvenient fact and carry on.]
 
L=Iw? I'm still kind of lost...
 
Sucks@Physics said:
L=Iw?
That's a perfectly OK way to approach it (but not the only way). What's I? What's w? (How does w relate to tangential speed?)

I_1 \omega_1 = I_2 \omega_2
 
v/r =w and I = mr^2 so...

I = 2kg*.750^2 = 1.125
5m/s/.750 = 6.667
L=1.125*6.667 = 7.5

I=2kg*.250^2 =.125

7.5/.125 = 80 m/s

Where did i mess up?
 
Sucks@Physics said:
7.5/.125 = 80 m/s

Where did i mess up?
(1) Recheck your arithmetic.
(2) L/I = w, not v. (But w = v/r.)
 
Awesome! I got it thanks a lot!
 
Back
Top