Magnetostatics and Electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the relationship between positive and negative charge densities in a moving wire, specifically how the negative charge density (p-) relates to the positive charge density (p+) through the Lorentz factor (gamma). It is clarified that gamma is defined as 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), where v is the velocity of the moving charges and c is the speed of light. The conversation highlights that the movement of charges induces a magnetic field, which exerts a force on the moving charges that must be balanced by an electrostatic attraction. Participants emphasize the importance of charge conservation and the effects of Lorentz contraction on volume when applying relativity principles. The discussion concludes with a suggestion to reconsider the approach based on insights from another participant.
johanjones190
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem, I have no idea how to do this!

(In a single straight wire) If the positive charges (density p+) are at rest, and the negative charges (density p-) move at speed v, show that:

p- = -(p+)*(gamma)^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is gamma some kind of ratio?

The traveling charges (enclosed current) induces a magnetic field which in turn imposes a force on moving charges, which then must be offset by an electrostatic attraction.
 
Yeah gamma = 1/ sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) where v is velocity and c is the speed of light!
 
Try to think that the global electric charge must be conserved, and see how in relativity change the volumes by lorentz contraction. then remember that Q=density times volume and you'll get the answer...
 
Astronuc said:
The traveling charges (enclosed current) induces a magnetic field which in turn imposes a force on moving charges, which then must be offset by an electrostatic attraction.
for get this approach and go with what Marco_84 suggested. I was thinking something entirely different, not realizing that this was about SR.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top