Calculus-Analytic-Geometry by George-Simmons

  • Thread starter Thread starter al-mahed
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a calculus textbook, which is noted for being well-written and straightforward, similar to the author's Precalculus review book that users find helpful. It serves as the foundation for MIT's Math 18.01 and 18.02 courses, indicating its academic credibility. Despite the presence of some negative reviews on Amazon, the overall consensus leans towards positive feedback, suggesting it is a strong choice among calculus texts. Participants express interest in comparing this book with other calculus resources to determine the best options available.
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have it personally, but I do have his Precalculus review book and I like it a lot. It's well written, easy to follow and pretty much straight to the point.
 
Last edited:
This text is also used as the basis for MIT's 2006 version of Math 18.01 and 18.02. Please see ocw.mit.edu for details.

Wayne
 
I have the Simmons book in fact. The reason that led me to ask for others people opinios is that I saw some bad reviews about the book on amazon.com (although most of the reviews are positive), so perhaps someone who know this book and another good book on calculus could give an opinion of what is the best and why.
 
Search Calculus book - https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It actually looks like it has good reviews on Amazon. At least compared to other calculus texts.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top