Solve Shuffleboard Problem: Acceleration & Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathartics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a shuffleboard disk that accelerates and then decelerates. The disk accelerates from rest to 4.2 m/s over a distance of 1.4 m before losing contact with the cue and subsequently decelerating at 2.7 m/s² until it stops. Participants suggest breaking the problem into two parts: calculating the time and distance during acceleration and then during deceleration. There are multiple calculations presented, with some participants identifying errors in the distance and time calculations, leading to confusion about the total distance traveled and the total time elapsed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying formulas and understanding the problem's structure to arrive at accurate answers.
Cathartics
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A shuffleboard disk is accelerated at a constant rate from rest to a speed of 4.2 m/s over a 1.4 m distance by a player using a cue. At this point the disk loses contact with the cue and slows at a constant rate of 2.7 m/s2 until it stops.

(a) How much time elapses from when the disk begins to accelerate until it stops?
(b) What total distance does the disk travel?

I don't even know where to begin on this one, Please give me any hints, concept or formula's to begin with. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cathartics said:
A shuffleboard disk is accelerated at a constant rate from rest to a speed of 4.2 m/s over a 1.4 m distance by a player using a cue. At this point the disk loses contact with the cue and slows at a constant rate of 2.7 m/s2 until it stops.

(a) How much time elapses from when the disk begins to accelerate until it stops?

Break the problem into 2 pieces. First determine how long the cue is in contact with the disk, then determine how much more time it takes for the disk to come to a stop after the cue loses contact with it.

(b) What total distance does the disk travel?

Again, break it up into 2 pieces. Determine the distance traveled while the cue is in contact with the disc, then determine the additional distance traveled after the cue loses contact.
 
Firstly thanks tom for that info. Here is what i did.

first i found t1 that's when it was in contact with the cue where
vo= om/s (initial velocity), vf = 4.2 m/s (final velocity) and x= total distant
using the formula x = ((vo + vf)*t) / 2 then t = .66s this is the contact time.

After it loses contact i found how long did it traveled by using
vf = 0 (final velocity) and vo = 4.2 (initial velocity) and a = 2.7 m/s^2 using the formula
x = vf^2 - (4.2)^2 / - 2.7 which would yield 6.53 m

then by using the above value i found t for the first part of the problem by formula
x = 1/2 (vf+vo) *t where x =6.53 and vo = 4.2

answer (a) = 3.11s
answer (b) = 6.53m

But when i plug in the numbers it say's that I'm doing something wrong and answers dosent match. Please tell me what went wrong am i working on with a wrong concept or am i junt punching numbers to a formula, thanks in advance..
 
Any help? please!
 
---------------
 
Last edited:
Final call please help help!
 
Sorry, I was away for a few days.

first i found t1 that's when it was in contact with the cue where
vo= om/s (initial velocity), vf = 4.2 m/s (final velocity) and x= total distant
using the formula x = ((vo + vf)*t) / 2 then t = .66s this is the contact time.

That's correct.

After it loses contact i found how long did it traveled by using
vf = 0 (final velocity) and vo = 4.2 (initial velocity) and a = 2.7 m/s^2 using the formula
x = vf^2 - (4.2)^2 / - 2.7 which would yield 6.53 m

That's the right formula, but I get 3.27m not 6.53m.

That error will propagate through the rest of your calculation.

There's one other misconception you have.

then by using the above value i found t for the first part of the problem by formula
x = 1/2 (vf+vo) *t where x =6.53 and vo = 4.2

That doesn't make any sense. You already found t for the first part of the problem: t=0.66s. Also, why would you use x for the second part of the problem to find t for the first part?

answer (a) = 3.11s
answer (b) = 6.53m

This doesn't make any sense either. You're saying that the x you found for the second part of the problem is the same as x for the entire trip of the puck from start to finish. That would imply that the puck travels a zero distance for the first part of the problem, contrary to the given info.
 
Back
Top