Register to reply

String stars instead of black holes?

by Maniax
Tags: black, holes, stars, string
Share this thread:
May20-08, 01:01 AM
P: 3
Hey guys!
My first post - found this forum filled with lots of smart minds. Maybe you can help me out here. I'm quite the novice, so bear with me, pls :)

Anyways, I read somewhere (scientific american i believe) that strings (if they exist) cannot be crushed, or shrunk anymore than what they are now.

So - when a star collapses heading for a neutron star, matter cracks up and becomes all neutrons. When gravity is strong enough, that might become an even denser quark star (wikipedia). But given more gravity we classically get the black hole. And the, for me, very strange thought of a singularity and infinity.

What if the quarks in the former star collapses to bare strings? And that the collapse stops when the strings are naked and all packed snuggly together?

What would that star look like? Very much like a black hole, i presume - really dense, small, and with a huge gravity for its size. But without the singularity.

Can anyone do the math for a typical size of this star? Given that a string is belived to be around 10 sq -35 m long (and if we assume that the string is a tiny sphere of that diameter and not a 2 dimensional string) and that there is about 10 sq 42 atoms in a star?

What do you say?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Cool calculations for cold atoms: New theory of universal three-body encounters
New method for non-invasive prostate cancer screening
How bubble studies benefit science and engineering

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Mini-Black Holes and Stars Winking Out Cosmology 9
Strange Quarks, Quark Stars, & Black Holes Astronomy & Astrophysics 8
Black holes in String theory Cosmology 1
First Stars - How big - Now Black Holes? Astronomy & Astrophysics 55