Linear algebra question (using braket notation).


by MathematicalPhysicist
Tags: algebra, braket, linear, notation
MathematicalPhysicist
MathematicalPhysicist is offline
#1
May31-08, 02:43 AM
P: 3,177
the question:

Let {|u>,|v>} be a basis for a linear space, suppose that <u|v>=0, then prove that:
[tex]A|v>=<A>I|v>+\delta A|u>[/tex]
where, A is hermitian operator, and [tex]<A>=<v|A|v>,\delta A= A-<A>I[/tex]
where I is the identity operator.

my attempt at solution:
basically, from the definitions i need to prove that [tex]\delta A|u>=\delta A|v>[/tex]
now, obviously <A>=<v|A|v>=[tex]\int du <v|u><u|A|v>[/tex]=0
cause <u|v> equals zero, so we actually need to prove that A|u>=A|v>
but A|u>=u|u> where u is the eigenvalue of |u>, then if we multiply it by <u| we get:
<u|A|u>=u (i guess that |u> and |v> are normalised), but from the same assertion as above we get that <u|A|u>=0 and so u=0, and so is v=0, so we get that A|u>=A|v>=0.
is this correct or totally mamabo jambo as i think?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
DavidWhitbeck
DavidWhitbeck is offline
#2
May31-08, 09:43 AM
P: 352
Oh no there is something wrong in your argument. The vector u is orthogonal to v, it is a specific vector. When you invoke completeness you are summing over all vectors, and not just the ones orthogonal to v. It is not true that <A> = 0.
DavidWhitbeck
DavidWhitbeck is offline
#3
May31-08, 09:48 AM
P: 352
The completeness relation in this problem is

[tex]|u><u| + |v><v| = 1[/tex] since u and v form an orthonormal basis.

And you can say that also since they are a basis that there exists complex numbers [itex]\alpha, \beta[/itex] such that

[tex]A|v> = \alpha |u> + \beta |v>[/tex]

It is very easy to show that

[tex]\beta = <A>[/tex]

And then you're left with the other term, and maybe there the completeness relation is helpful.

George Jones
George Jones is offline
#4
May31-08, 12:38 PM
Mentor
George Jones's Avatar
P: 6,044

Linear algebra question (using braket notation).


It's easy to find an example that contradicts the assertion that you're trying to prove. If fact, since

[tex]
A \left| v \right> = \left< A \right> \left| v \right> + \delta A \left| u \right>
[/tex]

is equivalent to

[tex]
A \left| v \right> - \left< A \right> \left| v \right> = \delta A \left| u \right>
[/tex]

and, from the given,

[tex]
A \left| v \right> - \left< A \right> \left| v \right> = \left( A - \left< A \right> I \right) \left| v \right> = \delta A \left| v \right>,
[/tex]

so your assertion is true iff [itex]\delta A \left| v\right> = \delta A \left| u \right>[/itex].

Maybe you're actually trying to prove the trivial

[tex]
A \left| v \right> = \left< A \right> \left| v \right> + \delta A \left| v \right>
[/tex].
George Jones
George Jones is offline
#5
May31-08, 12:53 PM
Mentor
George Jones's Avatar
P: 6,044
Quote Quote by George Jones View Post
so your assertion is true iff [itex]\delta A \left| v\right> = \delta A \left| u \right>[/itex].
Oops, I see that you already know this.

Cleary,the equations [itex]A \left| u \right> = \left| u \right>[/itex] and [itex]A \left| v \right> = 0[/itex] define a unique Hermitian operator [itex]A[/itex]. Now,

[tex]
\left< A \right> = 0
[/tex]

[tex]
\delta A = A
[/tex].

Therefore,

[tex]
\delta A \left| u \right> = A \left| u \right> = \left| u \right>
[/tex]

[tex]
\delta A \left| v \right> = A \left| v \right> = 0.
[/tex]
MathematicalPhysicist
MathematicalPhysicist is offline
#6
Jun2-08, 10:23 AM
P: 3,177
well i think that delta A is zero, becasue delta A is: sqrt(<v|A^2|v>-<A>^2) (and not an operator as i first thought)
and:
<v|A^2|v>=beta^2
cause A is hermitian (becasue we know that hermitian matrices can always be diagonalize, by lagrange method of squaring) then A|v>=v|v> where v is its eigenvalue, and A|u>=u|u>
from here its obvious that: <v|A|v>=v and <v|A|u>=<u|A|v>=0, and thus we get what we need.

is my reasoning correct?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
[SOLVED] linear algebra - inner product and linear transformation question Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Linear algebra - notation? Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Simple linear algebra notation queery: Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Linear Algebra question Introductory Physics Homework 5
Linear Algebra question. Calculus & Beyond Homework 3