Thread Closed

series identity

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun11-08, 08:01 AM   #1
 

series identity


for every sequence of numbers a_n E_n is this identity correct ?

[tex] \sum_{n= -\infty}^{\infty}a_n e^{2\pi i E_{n}}= \sum_{n= -\infty}^{\infty}a_n \delta (x-E_{n}) [/tex]
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Jun11-08, 08:05 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Clearly it isn't (and I assume that you mean to have an x in the exponent on the LHS).
Jun11-08, 09:15 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Perhaps you meant to integrate the RHS over the real line?
Jun11-08, 10:37 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help

series identity


That looked a little familiar to me so I dug out my signals notes and found the following:



Here FT refers to fourier transform and FS fourier series. As for how "it can be shown", I have no idea.
Jun11-08, 01:10 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I suspect I know who this poster is, and the same advice I've given repeatedly still applies: have you tried it for any examples? Eg a_i=0 for i=/=0 and a_0=1, E_0=0, then the LHS is 1 and the RHS is d(x) (d for delta)...
Jun11-08, 03:11 PM   #6
rbj
 
This is true

[tex] \sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{i 2 \pi n x} = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta(x-k) [/tex]

but to generalize it with arbitrary coefficients (that are placed on both sides) is not a true equality.
Jun12-08, 02:49 AM   #7
 
rbj and matt were right only this

[tex]
\sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{i 2 \pi n x} = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty} \delta(x-k)
[/tex] (1)

is correct , however my question is if using Fourier analysis we could generalized to an identity

[tex]
\sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty}a_{n} e^{i 2 \pi n x} = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty} b_{n}\delta(x-k)
[/tex]

where the a_n and b_n are related by some way , this is interesting regarding an article of Functional equation for Dirichlet series, using (1) the author was able to proof the functional equation for Riemann Zeta, my idea was to develop a functional equation for almost every dirichlet series to see where they have the 'poles'
Jun12-08, 05:13 AM   #8
 
If we have in the general case

[tex] \sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty}b_{n} e^{i 2 \pi n x} = D A(x) [/tex]

Where A(x) is the partial sum of a_n and D is the derivative operator , in case A(x)=[x] we recover usual delta identity , then i believe we can calculate b_n by the Fourier integral

[tex] b_n = \int_{0}^{1} dx DA(x) e^{-2i\pi x} [/tex]
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: series identity
Thread Forum Replies
Fourier series: Parseval's identity... HELP! Calculus & Beyond Homework 11
New recursive series identity Linear & Abstract Algebra 14
[Identity relations] Need help at some odd identity relation problem Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Using an identity to find the sum to n terms of a series Calculus & Beyond Homework 7