How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?

AI Thread Summary
To measure the tangential component of velocity for receding stars or quasars, one must consider that redshift only provides the radial component of velocity. Nearby stars exhibit individual motion with both radial and tangential components, which can be measured by tracking their positions over time and applying trigonometry to calculate the angle of movement. In contrast, recession speed due to cosmic expansion, as described by General Relativity, is purely radial and lacks a tangential component. While distant receding objects may have some individual proper motion, it is typically negligible compared to their recession speed. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate measurements in astrophysics.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?
I ask this because the velocity determined by observing the red shift will give only the radial component...
Thnx for replying...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
aniketp said:
Hi all,
How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?
I ask this because the velocity determined by observing the red shift will give only the radial component...
Thnx for replying...

nearby stars, like in our galaxy, are not receding from us as part of the general expansion. they just have their own individual motion, with radial and tangential components

tangential velocity of nearby stars in our galaxy can be measured by comparing positions over the course of many years
one figures out the distance to the thing, and one measures the tiny angle it moves per year, and uses trig. (multiply the distance times the angle in radians rate of change)

recession speed----that due to the expansion of distances a la General Relativity----is different from usual velocity. It only has a radial component. There is no tangential component to measure

a distant receding object can also have some individual proper motion. But this is often small compared with recession speed and may even be neglected.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top