Register to reply

Rocket equation

by calculus_jy
Tags: equation, rocket
Share this thread:
Jul15-08, 11:17 PM
P: 56
recenty i read the rocket equation, derivation of, however i think i have a slight confusion with signs
suppost initially a rocket has
mass= [tex]M[/tex]
velocity= [tex]\overrightarrow{v}[/tex]
then at a time dt later,
mass of rocket= [tex]M-dM[/tex]
velocity of rocket= [tex]\overrightarrow {v} +d\overrightarrow {v} [/tex]
mass of ejacted gas= [tex]dM[/tex]
velocity of gas= [tex]\overrightarrow{u}[/tex]

using conservation of momentum


but [tex](\overrightarrow{u}-\overrightarrow{v})[/tex]=velocity of gas relative to rocket
let [tex](\overrightarrow{u}-\overrightarrow{v})=\overrightarrow{U}[/tex]which is a constant

[tex]-\int_{M_0}^{M}\frac{dM}{M}=\frac{1}{\overrightarrow{U}}\int_{\overright arrow{v}_0}^{\overrightarrow{v}}d\overrightarrow{v}[/tex]

now [tex]-ln\frac{M}{M_0}=\frac{\overrightarrow{v}-\overrightarrow{v_0}}{\overrightarrow{U}}[/tex]

the problem is , when taking the velocity in the direciton rocket is travelling
[tex]-ln\frac{M}{M_0}>0[/tex]since [tex]\frac{M}{M_0}<1[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{v}-\overrightarrow{v_0}<0[/tex] which is impossibe as the rocket is accelerating???
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
UCI team is first to capture motion of single molecule in real time
And so they beat on, flagella against the cantilever
Tandem microwave destroys hazmat, disinfects
Jul15-08, 11:29 PM
P: 56
latex problem seems to be fixed now...
Jul16-08, 11:39 PM
P: 7
i dont see how you get [tex]
M- dM
[tex] is is because of [tex]E=mc^2[tex]

Jul16-08, 11:45 PM
P: 7
Rocket equation

why won't the latex work
Jul17-08, 05:34 AM
P: 25
Quote Quote by Poincare1 View Post
why won't the latex work
I hope this isn't too off topic but

i think you need [/tex] instead of [tex] at the end
Jul17-08, 07:32 AM
P: 15,202
Quote Quote by calculus_jy View Post
Good up to this point.
This step is not valid. There is no such thing as the multiplicative inverse of a vector. Better is to define a unit vector v-hat directed along the rocket's delta-v vector. From the correct equation, this delta-v vector is directly opposed to the relative exhaust velocity vector. Thus

d\overrightarrow{v} &= dv \hat{v} \\
\overrightarrow{U} &= U \hat{v} & (U &\equiv \overrightarrow{U}\cdot \hat v)\\
&= -v_e \hat{v} & (v_e&\equiv -U)

Note that ve is simply the magnitude of the relative velocity vector. With this, the vector differential equation becomes the scalar equation


from which

[tex]\int_{M_0}^{M}\frac {dM}{M} = \frac 1{v_e}\int_{v_0}^v dv[/tex]


[tex]\ln\frac{M}{M_0} = \frac{\Delta v}{v_e}[/tex]

You can use a vector formulation, but you can't divide by a vector like you did.
Jul17-08, 05:36 PM
P: 56
however is the equation
[tex]v=v_0+\overrightarrow{U}ln\frac{M}{M_0}[/tex] not right?using the notion in the first post
in the step with the integrals, to prevent multiplicative of inverse of vector, simply put [tex]\overrightarrow{U}[/tex]
on the same side of the equation as [tex]\frac{dM}{M}[/tex]
i have been told that its the problem associated with dM such that the mass of rocket after dt is M+dM not M-dM
i dont get why minus can be used in scalar, but cannot be used in vercot derivation?
Jul17-08, 06:21 PM
P: 15,202
Your error occurs much earlier than I stated earlier.

Quote Quote by calculus_jy View Post
using conservation of momentum
Here your dM is the quantity of mass ejected by the spacecraft. With this definition, a positive dM means the spacecraft loses mass. Things would have worked properly if you had used dM as positive meaning the spacecraft gains mass. Then the conservation of momentum equation becomes

Nov27-10, 01:02 AM
P: 2
Go through this site

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Rocket equation? verfication Introductory Physics Homework 13
Differential equation of a rocket Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Rocket equation General Discussion 6
Rocket Equation Derivation Introductory Physics Homework 4