Can Injective Functions Imply Surjective Ones Without the Axiom of Choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobrhcp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if A is not empty and s:A->B is injective, then there is a surjective function f:B->A such that f(s(a))=a for all a in A. Do not use the Axiom of Choice

The Attempt at a Solution



for all b', b'' in B s(b')=s(b'') means b'=b''. So s^-1 (c) is unique in A. Because any point in A is sent to at most one point in B, we can just let f send every point in B of the form s(c) to c.

now we only need to send all the other points somewhere. Here I need to 'pick' some point once again. Why do I not need the AC here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacobrhcp said:
now we only need to send all the other points somewhere. Here I need to 'pick' some point once again. Why do I not need the AC here?

Hi jacobrhcp! :smile:

Because the axiom of choice is only for choosing the whole set … here, you only need to choose one element. :wink:

For revision, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top