Can Injective Functions Imply Surjective Ones Without the Axiom of Choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobrhcp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if A is not empty and s:A->B is injective, then there is a surjective function f:B->A such that f(s(a))=a for all a in A. Do not use the Axiom of Choice

The Attempt at a Solution



for all b', b'' in B s(b')=s(b'') means b'=b''. So s^-1 (c) is unique in A. Because any point in A is sent to at most one point in B, we can just let f send every point in B of the form s(c) to c.

now we only need to send all the other points somewhere. Here I need to 'pick' some point once again. Why do I not need the AC here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacobrhcp said:
now we only need to send all the other points somewhere. Here I need to 'pick' some point once again. Why do I not need the AC here?

Hi jacobrhcp! :smile:

Because the axiom of choice is only for choosing the whole set … here, you only need to choose one element. :wink:

For revision, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top