Free particle and Heisenburg uncertainty principle

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Assuming at time is zero, the wavefunction of a free particle is given as

<br /> \Psi(x, 0) = \left\{<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> 0, \quad x&lt;0\\<br /> f(x), \quad x&gt;0<br /> \end{matrix}<br /> \right.<br />

where f(x) is integrable within (0, \infty)


Find the time evolution of \Psi(x, 0). Write down the steps how to show Heisenberg briefly.

2. The attempt at a solution
Since this is a free particle, we use the completeness of eigenstates in momentum space to do the problem.

\phi_p = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\exp(ipx/\hbar)

The orthogonality is

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi^*_p(x)\phi_{p&#039;}(x)dx = \delta(p&#039;-p)

The energy of the particle is given by

E=\hbar\omega = \frac{p^2}{2m}

Now, the initial state can be written in terms of eigenstates of momentum (or Fourier transform)

\Psi(x, 0) = \int c(p) \phi_p(x) dp

multiply both side with \phi_{p&#039;}(x), take the integral and applying orthogonality, we find

c(p) = \int \Psi(x, 0)\phi^*_p(x)dx

Hence , the time evolution of the initial state is just

<br /> \begin{matrix}<br /> \Psi(x, t) &amp; = &amp; \displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dp \left[\int \Psi(x, 0)\phi^*_p(x)dx\right]\phi_p(x) \exp(-i\omega t)} \\ \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; \displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dp \left[\int \Psi(x, 0)\phi^*_p(x)\phi_p(x)dx\right] \exp(-i\omega t)} \\ \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2\pi\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dp \exp(-i\omega t)\left[\int_0^\infty \Psi(x, 0)dx\right]} \\ \\<br /> &amp; = &amp; \displaystyle{\frac{F(x)}{2\pi\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dp \exp\left(-i\frac{p^2}{2m\hbar}t\right)}<br /> \end{matrix}<br />

where

<br /> F(x) = \int_0^\infty f(x) dx <br />


So far, I think my solution is quite correct, right? But I thought about it for long time and have no idea how to do the last integral!


For illustrating the Heisenberg principle based on the initial state, the steps could be concluded as

1) find \langle x^2 \rangle and \langle x \rangle in initial state \Psi(x, 0), so the variance of x would be

\Delta x = \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle^2}

2) find \langle p^2 \rangle and \langle p \rangle in momentum state \phi(p), so the variance of p would be

\Delta p = \sqrt{\langle p^2 \rangle - \langle p \rangle^2}

3) multiply \Delta x and \Delta p to find the relation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, sorry, you made a mistake in the first equation after "Hence". There are two different x's in this equation, the one being integrated over in brackets, and the one that is an argument of \Psi on the left, and of \phi_p on the right.
 
Avodyne said:
No, sorry, you made a mistake in the first equation after "Hence". There are two different x's in this equation, the one being integrated over in brackets, and the one that is an argument of \Psi on the left, and of \phi_p on the right.

Oh, how careless I am ... so I know what's going on now.

What about the second part? Is that the right steps to prove Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
 
I guess. I actually don't think this is a very good question. Knowing that the initial wave function is zero for x<0 isn't very helpful for finding out the wave function at later times, so it's not clear to me what they're looking for in terms of the uncertainty principle.

I'm about to go offline for a week, so won't be able to reply further. Good luck!
 
Well, in any case, the integral you were trying to do is commonly encountered in quantum mechanics. Try taking the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta function and see what happens.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top