HELP Trying to Make a Spring Car No Mouse Traps

  • Thread starter Thread starter panthrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Spring
AI Thread Summary
A high school senior is seeking advice on building a car powered by a 3" X 1/2" compression spring, moving away from the previous year's mouse trap design. The challenge lies in effectively harnessing the spring's energy to maximize distance traveled. Suggestions include using a lever to reduce the force exerted by the spring and wrapping a string around the axle, while considering the mechanics of levers and pulleys for optimal energy transfer. Additionally, rethinking the design to compress or stretch the spring while the car rolls may provide new insights. The discussion emphasizes the importance of exploring various mechanical systems to achieve the desired outcome.
panthrt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a senior in High School, I have been given a 3" X 1/2" compression spring that must power a car. This is not a mouse trap powered car, (that was last year). I need help trying to determine high to harness the extreme energy stored in this heavy spring and somehow get a car to travel the farthest. In the mouse trap car it was very easy I simply used a rod long enough to slowly release the energy over a long time period. With this spring I would need a 2X4 attached to wheels. I have tried to attach a small fish line to the spring and then around the axle, but there is so much pressure when the spring is compressed that it does not wrap around the axle. I have tried wire, wax string rubber coated string, I just think that variation will not work, I need some other input. Thank you Nate!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using a lever on the spring to reduce the force then use string on end of lever wrapped around an axle.

There are four basic machines I can think of which can trade off force vs. distance of travel.
The lever
The pulley
The inclined plane or wedge
and systems of pistons pneumatic or hydrolic.

I would guess a piston system is too complex for your application.
I would think a wedge system would have too much friction for your application. These are better for increasing forces.
This leaves levers and pulleys and I think you'll find some combination is best.

I would also suggest you try thinking of the problem in reverse... how to compress or stretch that spring by rolling your car. This may help you visualize different possible configurations.
 
  • Like
Likes Moha1995mmad
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top