I used to run track and had a teammate that ran virtually identical

  • Thread starter Thread starter rlarson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Track
AI Thread Summary
When racing with added weight, a larger athlete may have an advantage due to their greater strength and ability to generate power. The impact of the extra weight on performance is complex and varies based on individual body mechanics and conditioning. As the weight increases, such as with a 100-pound backpack, the disparity in strength and power output becomes more significant. The physics of running with additional weight does not provide a straightforward answer, as it depends on how each athlete's body adapts to the load. Ultimately, the stronger athlete is likely to perform better with heavier weights due to their superior strength-to-weight ratio.
rlarson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I used to run track and had a teammate that ran virtually identical times to me in everything we did. He was a bigger guy (5'11" 180lbs. vs. 5'8" 145lbs.) and much stronger than me in the weight room.

I've always been curious about something and am not sure how the physics behind it works. If we raced each other with 25lb. backpacks on would he now have an advantage? My intuition says yes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't really use an argument from physics to answer this, since your reaction to the extra weight is more a function of your bodies ability to create power. There isn't a simple physical explanation for how it does. But I would probably agree with your rough reasoning.
 
Increase the weight of the backpack to (say) 100 pounds. What do you think now?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Back
Top