Understanding the Three Body Problem in Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter JANm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of the three-body problem in orbital mechanics, particularly regarding the orbits of a very light body around a middle-sized body, which itself orbits a much heavier body. The calculations indicate that the light body cannot maintain an orbit at distances of 0.9 to 1.1 times the radius of the middle body's orbit, as it would be pulled into an independent orbit around the heaviest body. The limitations of these orbits are defined by the Hill sphere and Laplace's sphere of influence, which provide different approximations for the maximum distance a smaller body can orbit another in a three-body system. Despite the challenges, approximations can yield accurate solutions for complex orbital scenarios. The discussion highlights the ongoing mystery and challenges of the three-body problem in astrophysics.
JANm
Messages
222
Reaction score
0
Suppose a body in a circular orbit around a very heavy one. The body itself has a very light one moving in an small orbit in the same plane.

1 What is the orbit of the very light one in space?

very= 1000 times, so the heaviest= 1 million times heavier than the "smallest".

small=1/10, so the smallest distance of the very light one 0,9 times the radius of the orbit of the body around the heaviest and the largest distance of the very light one is 1,1 times the radius of the orbit of the body around the heaviest one, approximately.

2 do these numbers 0,9 and 1,1 need corrections?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The largest orbit a one body can have around another body when the 2nd body orbits a third body is limited by the Hill sphere.

This is found by:

R = a \sqrt[3]{\frac{m}{3M}}

In this case, we define "a" as the orbit of the middle sized object around the largest object and assign it a value of 1.

m is the mass of the middle sized object and also will equal 1
M is the mass of the largest object and therefore = 1000.

so:

R = 1 \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{3(100)}} = 0.069

Which is smaller than the 0.1 you are trying to use for the smallest object's orbit around the middle sized one. IOW, the smallest object cannot orbit at that distance from the middle sized one. It would be pulled away into an independent orbit around the largest object.
 
The three body problem in orbital mechanics has, to my knowledge, never been completely solved. It is a humbling reminder of how much we have yet to learn about the universe. We can, however, approximate solutions to problems such as this, as well as much more complicated systems with amazing accuracy.
 
Janus said:
The largest orbit a one body can have around another body when the 2nd body orbits a third body is limited by the Hill sphere.

This is found by:

R = a \sqrt[3]{\frac{m}{3M}}
More or less. This is a three body problem, after all. An alternative to the Hill sphere is Laplace's sphere of influence:

R = a\left(\frac m M\right)^{2/5}

With M=1000*m, the sphere of influence is 6.3% of the distance between the primary and secondary bodies (compare to 6.9% for the Hill sphere).

Interestingly, neither the Hill sphere nor the sphere of influence is a sphere.
 
Chronos said:
The three body problem in orbital mechanics has, to my knowledge, never been completely solved. It is a humbling reminder of how much we have yet to learn about the universe. We can, however, approximate solutions to problems such as this, as well as much more complicated systems with amazing accuracy.
Hello Chronos
Thanks for this poetical way of understanding three body problems.
I don't quite understand the Lagrange like boarders for posing three-body problems... I have taken care that my problem didnot counteract geometrical possibility by defining radii, I have sayd things about masses, must say have defined them relatively absolute, but the impossibilities of the posing of the question gathers around...
greetings Janm
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
300
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top