Moment of Intertia, proving Parralel axis theorum. Help please.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia (I) for an equilateral triangle rotated about the z-axis, with a constant depth (d). The initial calculations involve integrating to find I using the density (p) and volume (V) relationships. A new scenario is introduced where the triangle's vertex is displaced from the z-axis, leading to a piecewise function for B(r). The user seeks guidance on generalizing the method for various shapes and questions the validity of their approach, emphasizing the need for a clear understanding of the moment of inertia as a vector quantity. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the parallel axis theorem in this context.
Starwatcher16
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Imagine we have a Equilateral triangle in the xy plane with one vertex at the origin. The triangle will be rotated about the z axis. The depth of the triangle, d, will be constant.B_r=B(r)

From the picture I see that B_r=\frac{r}{h}B , V=\frac{B_rhd}{2}=\frac{Bdr}{2}

First, I need to find I.

<br /> I=\sum M_i*r_i^2=\int r^2 dm. p=M/V, so, dp=p dv

<br /> I=p\int r^2 dv Substituting usingdp=p dv and dv=\frac{Bd}{2}dr, we get:

<br /> I=\frac{pBd}{2}*\int r^2 dr=\frac{pBd}{2}*\frac{r^3}{3}. Using p=M/V:
<br /> I=\frac{Mr^3}{3h}=\frac{Mr^2}{3}. R_total/h=1.

Now, let's say I want to find I for the same shape, but now there is a distance d from the vertex to the z axis.

Everything is the same as the above, except, B_r is now a piecewise function, where B(r)=0 for r<d and B(r)=B_r=\frac{r-d}{h}B for r&gt;d.

Reworking it with the new B_r, I can get the new I. After that I just solve for x in I_2=I_1+x to get the parallel axis theorem.

The thing is, I don't know how to generalize this one example to work for all shapes. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lets pretend that whoever answers my question get free cookies.

Also, now that I think about it, I am not sure this method is valid.
 
Yes picking a shape will not help you prove the theorem. What is the definition of the moment of inertia? Note that it is a vector quantity. Now displace the axis a distance d away from the original axis, note that d is a vector too.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top