Register to reply 
Beta function QED 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jun1109, 07:09 PM

P: 969

The beta function for QED is given by:
[tex]\beta=\frac{e^3}{16 \pi^2}*\frac{4}{3}*(Q_i)^2[/tex] where [tex](Q_i)^2[/tex] represents the sum of the squares of the charges of all Dirac fields. For one generation, for the charge squared you have (2/3)^2 for the up quark, (1/3)^2 for the down quark, but this is all multiplied by 3 for the 3 colors of quarks, and then you have (1)^2 for the electron and (0)^2 for its neutrino. So all in all, 3[(2/3)^2+(1/3)^2]+(1)^2=8/3 However this gives a beta function that is not equal to the book value of: [tex]\beta=\frac{e^3}{16 \pi^2}*\frac{20}{9}[/tex] So is the book wrong? 


#2
Jun1109, 11:42 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,190

20/9 is the coefficient for the contribution of one quarklepton generation to the beta function for hypercharge, not QED.



#3
Jun1209, 02:20 PM

P: 969

Ah that's it. But now I have to recalculate the beta function for the hypercharge. Darn it.
Do you remember Srednicki ever providing justification that the coupling constants of SU(3), SU(2), and U(1) are unified to the coupling constant of SU(5) (well within a factor of 3/5 for the U(1) coupling constant) at the mass of the Xparticle? I mean you can show that the 3 couplings of the product group meet at a point, but after that point what's the justification for using SU(5) instead of just continuing to follow the three beta functions past that point, i.e., continue with SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1)? I don't recall ever seeing Srednicki talk about the phase transition. 


#4
Jun1209, 03:48 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,190

Beta function QED
He says after eq.(97.14) that the couplings are equal in the MSbar renormalization scheme, but that we should not use this scheme below MX. Then, at the bottom of p.630, he says that the usual beta functions apply if we integrate out the heavy fields. At the top of p.631, he says that we have to restore the heavy fields for mu>MX, and then the couplings are equal again. So it just depends on which renormalization scheme is most appropriate, the one with heavy fields included or the one with heavy fields integrated out.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Beta function and changing variables  Calculus & Beyond Homework  6  
Beta function ?  Advanced Physics Homework  2  
Strings and beta function.  Beyond the Standard Model  2  
Why is beta decay more common  Advanced Physics Homework  1  
Calculation of CallanSymanzik Beta function of QED/QCD to one loop order  Quantum Physics  4 