What would be outcome of experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zonde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
zonde
Gold Member
Messages
2,960
Reaction score
224
What would be outcome of such experiment:
We take EPR photon experiment where we direct one entangled photon to Bob's side and the other to Alice's side. We rotate polarization of photon at Alice's side by 22.5°. At both sides we direct photon to PBS and detect them in two detectors.
Only difference is that at each side before detection at one of two detectors we destroy entanglement of photon (if it's can be done).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be easier to predict outcome of EPR like experiment if instead of destroying entanglement we would rotate polarization by 45° before all four detectors (but after PBS)?
 
It is not clear what you are asking of the experiment.

You can rotate Alice and Bob (using say wave plates) and that will not affect their entanglement. If they are not entangled, you will not expect any special correlation over and above chance. Using a PBS with 2 detectors on each side, entanglement is terminated when you detect them. You could put additional polarizers in front of the detectors and after the PBS, and play with them that way I guess.
 
The question is that: from QM perspective - is it possible to change outcome of experiment by changing polarization properties after PBS?
It seems to me that it is possible because entangled pair of photons is wavefunction over all paths including paths after PBS. And changing wavefunction may change outcome of experiment.

But from local realism perspective it would seem that changing polarization properties after PBS should not change outcome because if photon is there then changing it's properties does not change the fact that it is there. Unless of course we assume unfair sampling at detectors.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top