Register to reply

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it does it make a sound?

by Monaco
Tags: falls, forest, sound, tree
Share this thread:
Monaco
#1
Oct24-09, 06:17 PM
P: 3
I'm trying to put an end this age old question, but I want to translate it into form of an equation.

SOME SAY: No, because "sound" is ears interpretation of those waves.
I SAY: Yes, because it makes a "sound" (as defined by the vibrations). I'm going by text book definition. It makes sound because sound is a wave vibration of physical matter. Whether or not it gets heard (perceived by ears), that sound still resonates with other medium. (reflects off a tree, hits blade of grass.) To me, that's like End Of Story.

When I read about all the factors of sound being formed, sound in motion, sound being translated through medium... only in the end, in it's final stretch of it's lifespan does the sound get heard or not get heard. To me it's just as cut and dry as the sound wave exists = there is sound. Put a video camera out there. Not only will it give you hard evidence in Dolby stereo, but you can watch the events that caused it.

If y=tree falling and x=sound generated, how would you put into an equation that x is true regardless of the medium of translation?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA team lays plans to observe new worlds
IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory
Spinach could lead to alternative energy more powerful than Popeye
rootX
#2
Oct24-09, 06:25 PM
rootX's Avatar
P: 1,294
I never able to find answer for my question which is similar: What is the Sound of the Single Hand?
BobG
#3
Oct24-09, 06:33 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
BobG's Avatar
P: 2,278
Put a window out in the middle of nowhere. Have a remote controlled plane break the sound barrier, creating a sonic boom.

Sound waves transmit energy.

27Thousand
#4
Oct24-09, 06:38 PM
P: 89
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it does it make a sound?

Quote Quote by Monaco View Post
I'm trying to put an end this age old question, but I want to translate it into form of an equation.

SOME SAY: No, because "sound" is ears interpretation of those waves.
I SAY: Yes, because it makes a "sound" (as defined by the vibrations). I'm going by text book definition. It makes sound because sound is a wave vibration of physical matter. Whether or not it gets heard (perceived by ears), that sound still resonates with other medium. (reflects off a tree, hits blade of grass.) To me, that's like End Of Story.

When I read about all the factors of sound being formed, sound in motion, sound being translated through medium... only in the end, in it's final stretch of it's lifespan does the sound get heard or not get heard. To me it's just as cut and dry as the sound wave exists = there is sound. Put a video camera out there. Not only will it give you hard evidence in Dolby stereo, but you can watch the events that caused it.

If y=tree falling and x=sound generated, how would you put into an equation that x is true regardless of the medium of translation?
Although I don't agree with this, some will say if you put a video out there, it's making it so it's sound all of a sudden. They say it's putting a human like observer that relays it to humans. (Sounds kind of like a debate between Albert Einstein and randomness) They say without the video camera, you have no way of verifying there's actually sound.

Yes I know this wouldn't make sense based on what we know about sound and thus contradicting what we already know, and in addition to that goes against parsimony, but some would still use that argument.

I wonder if you can evaluate how the leaves/dirt around the fallen tree are moved about and then plug in some equations to see if their design match how sound vibrations would dictate, which is a more naturalistic scientific approach, but then you know what the critics will say. They'll say you observed the leaves and dirt!
BobG
#5
Oct24-09, 06:43 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
BobG's Avatar
P: 2,278
Quote Quote by 27Thousand View Post
Although I don't agree with this, some will say if you put a video out there, it's making it so it's sound all of a sudden. They say it's putting a human like observer that relays it to humans. (Sounds kind of like a debate between Albert Einstein and randomness) They say without the video camera, you have no way of verifying there's actually sound.

Yes I know this wouldn't make sense based on what we know about sound and thus contradicting what we already know, and in addition to that goes against parsimony, but some would still use that argument.

I wonder if you can evaluate how the leaves/dirt around the fallen tree are moved about and then plug in some equations to see if their design match how sound vibrations would dictate, which is a more naturalistic scientific approach, but then you know what the critics will say. They'll say you observed the leaves and dirt!
There's only one way to prevent anyone or anything from observing the sound. That's to transmit the sound into a vacuum. In that particular instance, I'd have to agree that there's no sound. Of course, then the tree wouldn't be falling in a forest.
rootX
#6
Oct24-09, 06:45 PM
rootX's Avatar
P: 1,294
@OP:
If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it does it make a sound?
Well, no one is there to observe. I think you cannot put any measuring device.
27Thousand
#7
Oct24-09, 06:54 PM
P: 89
Here's an idea, have a lab experiment where you drop a tree and observe how the vibrations moves the dirt nearby vs. dropping a tree in a vacuum in the lab to see how only the impact hitting the ground vibrates the dirt. (leaves probably won't be sensitive enough to air vibrations, need dirt) Then you can get a schema for how air vibrations (sound waves) moves the dirt versus when in a vacuum. That wouldn't test for sound waves traveling through solids, but rather would test for it moving through the air. That would be an experimental-control for figuring out sounds traveling through air, and then could be used to test the real life examples.
NeoDevin
#8
Oct24-09, 07:06 PM
P: 687
If a man says something in the forest, and there's no woman around to hear; is he still wrong?
27Thousand
#9
Oct24-09, 07:09 PM
P: 89
Quote Quote by NeoDevin View Post
If a man says something in the forest, and there's no woman around to hear; is he still wrong?
Good point.
BobG
#10
Oct24-09, 07:19 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
BobG's Avatar
P: 2,278
Quote Quote by NeoDevin View Post
If a man says something in the forest, and there's no woman around to hear; is he still wrong?
He was goofing off in the forest instead of home mowing the lawn, wasn't he?
Monaco
#11
Oct24-09, 07:40 PM
P: 3
Ok, tree fall and either makes sound or doesn't make sound. Explain with an equation.
Topher925
#12
Oct24-09, 07:43 PM
Topher925's Avatar
P: 1,672
Yes. Topher = always right.
Jimmy Snyder
#13
Oct24-09, 09:19 PM
P: 2,179
It's not a deep philosphical question, it's just asking how you define the word 'forest'.
Santa1
#14
Oct24-09, 09:33 PM
P: 104
Define sound.
B. Elliott
#15
Oct24-09, 09:44 PM
PF Gold
B. Elliott's Avatar
P: 396
It doesn't become a sound until there is someone or something there to hear it. For it to be a sound, it requires there to be a receiver. Until then, it's just compression waves.
Pinu7
#16
Oct24-09, 09:46 PM
P: 270
Define your mom.

The tree falling riddle is supposed to be interpreted more deeply, which I thought it would be taken more seriously because this is pertaining to the philosophy of physics. The question can be more directly reworded as

"If we do not observe a specific case of natural phenomena, yet we can predict it based on physical laws we established, does it still follow this law?"

or

"If an electron is not directly observed, does it still have a definite position."

The answer to the latter is commonly answered as No.
GeorginaS
#17
Oct24-09, 09:50 PM
GeorginaS's Avatar
P: 380
Quote Quote by B. Elliott View Post
It doesn't become a sound until there is someone or something there to hear it. For it to be a sound, it requires there to be a receiver. Until then, it's just compression waves.
That's my thinking. Compression waves wafting through the air do not become "sound" until they react on an ear drum (human or animal) and all of that complicated stuff happens to transform the waves into electrical impulses that the brain interprets as a sound. Until all of that goes on, you've got nothing but waves.

Anb BobG's sonic boom may break the glass window, but that still doesn't make it a sound.
Evo
#18
Oct24-09, 09:55 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,423
Quote Quote by GeorginaS View Post
That's my thinking. Compression waves wafting through the air do not become "sound" until they react on an ear drum (human or animal) and all of that complicated stuff happens to transform the waves into electrical impulses that the brain interprets as a sound. Until all of that goes on, you've got nothing but waves.

Anb BobG's sonic boom may break the glass window, but that still doesn't make it a sound.
I'm more curious to know where this forest is that has trees but is devoid of all life.

My question would be "is it possible for a tree to fall in a forest where there is no life capable of hearing it?"


Register to reply

Related Discussions
If a tree falls in the woods... General Discussion 121
Whats the sound that you hear from scratching a fork on a plate called General Physics 10
Humans don't hear below ~20 Hz, so why can we hear a singular sound? General Physics 18
Piper the cat falls 80 feet from tree General Physics 8
If a tree falls...observerless events General Physics 2