How to prove the Newton's third law.


by IPhO' 2008
Tags: newton, prove
IPhO' 2008
IPhO' 2008 is offline
#1
Nov21-09, 11:03 AM
P: 44
I can't prove the Newton's third law.
Please tell me how to prove the Newton's third law.
Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
f95toli
f95toli is offline
#2
Nov21-09, 11:09 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
f95toli's Avatar
P: 2,197
You can't prove Newtons laws...
They are postulates, meaning they are assumed to be true.
arildno
arildno is offline
#3
Nov21-09, 11:19 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
Laws of physics have the same deductive status as axioms within maths.

One cannot prove either within each respective system, but for physics, the first selection principle for what is to count as laws is that they seem to work, in the sense of generating predictions that are confirmed by experience.

The second selection principle (among those postulated laws fulfilling the first) would be along the lines of parsimony/simplicity.

HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#4
Nov21-09, 11:49 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,882

How to prove the Newton's third law.


Quote Quote by f95toli View Post
You can't prove Newtons laws...
They are postulates, meaning they are assumed to be true.
More correctly, like all physics laws, they are derived from experiment.
putongren
putongren is offline
#5
Nov21-09, 05:16 PM
P: 62
How did Newton arrive at his third law? Did he just look at astronomical data and then arrive at his conclusion?
mikelepore
mikelepore is offline
#6
Nov21-09, 07:18 PM
P: 567
If we already know about conservation of momentum, it's easy. Let two objects be initially at rest. Let the two objects be an isolated system -- they may begin to exert forces on each other, but no forces on them come from outside. Let one object begin to exert force F1 on the other object. Assume that the second object exerts force F2 on the first, which is automatically valid because of its generality -- F2 would have the value 0 if it really doesn't exert one, and a nonzero value if it really does. Conservation of momentum, since the total momentum of the system was initially zero, it has to be finally zero. m1 v1 + m2 v2 = 0. Take the derivative of both sides: m1 a1 + m2 a2 = 0. Define the force on any object to be the derivative of its momentum: F = d(mv)/dt = m dv/dt = ma (Newton's 2nd law) . F1 + F2 = 0. F1 = -F2.
rcgldr
rcgldr is offline
#7
Nov21-09, 09:54 PM
HW Helper
P: 6,925
I think it would be more accurate to state that physics laws and theory's are verified to be resonably true (or accurate) by experiment, not proven.

I don't know if Newton derived his third law mathematically from his other laws or from observation of a relationship between forces and accelerations of varying objects, or from the fact that in any closed system, all internal forces must cancel.
YellowTaxi
YellowTaxi is offline
#8
Nov23-09, 09:03 AM
P: 196
Quote Quote by Jeff Reid View Post
I don't know if Newton derived his third law mathematically from his other laws or from observation of a relationship between forces and accelerations of varying objects, or from the fact that in any closed system, all internal forces must cancel.
I'm pretty certain the conservation of momentum law was already established by people like Descartes - maybe even before Newton was born. So all Newton probably did was apply some calculus to that already established law and thus 'discovered' the third law of motion. He only really discoverd a new way of looking at it.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Something I can't seem to prove... General Math 3
Prove Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Please prove this Differential Geometry 6
Need help proving an expression of roots of sums including roots General Math 16
How can prove this ? General Math 7