How to modify the following code?

  • Thread starter Thread starter winiepu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an issue with running a Fortran program that compiles successfully but encounters a runtime error, specifically a "handle exception: Error while dumping state." The original code structure separates the subroutine 'mylocate' from the main program, which seems to cause the problem. A user found that making 'mylocate' an internal subroutine within 'xlocate' allows the program to compile and run without errors. To troubleshoot the original code, it is suggested to add WRITE statements to display variable values during execution, helping to identify where the issue arises. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how subroutine scope and visibility can affect program execution in Fortran.
winiepu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I can compile the following code, but I can not run it in my computer. How do change it? Thanks.


module nrtype
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: SP = KIND(1.0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: DP = KIND(1.0D0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I4B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(9)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I2B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(4)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I1B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(2)
END module

program mainp
use nrtype
implicit none
call xlocate
end program

subroutine xlocate
USE nrtype
IMPLICIT NONE
!INTEGER(I4B), PARAMETER :: n=3
INTEGER(I4B) :: i,j
REAL(DP) :: x
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(4) :: xx
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(2):: xlim,ab
!real(DP), external:: mylocate1
xx=(/1.0_DP,2.0_DP,3.0_DP,4.0_DP/)
x=1.5_DP
CALL mylocate(xx,x,xlim,ab)
write(*,*) ab

END subroutine xlocate

SUBROUTINE mylocate(xx,x,xlim,ab)
USE nrtype
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(2), INTENT(OUT):: xlim, ab
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: xx
REAL(DP), INTENT(IN) :: x
INTEGER(I4B) :: k
INTEGER(I4B) :: n,jl,jm,ju
LOGICAL(I4B) :: ascnd
REAL(DP)::h
n=SIZE(xx)
ascnd = (xx(n) >= xx(1))
jl=0
ju=n+1
DO
IF (ju-jl <= 1) EXIT
jm=(ju+jl)/2
IF (ascnd .EQV. (x >= xx(jm))) THEN
jl=jm
ELSE
ju=jm
END IF
END DO
IF (x == xx(1)) THEN
k=1
ELSE IF (x == xx(n)) THEN
k=n-1
ELSE
k=jl
END IF
h=xx(k+1)-xx(k);

ab(1)=(xx(k+1)-x)/h;
ab(2)=(x-xx(k))/h;

xlim(1)=k;
xlim(2)=k+1;
END SUBROUTINE mylocate
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Can you be more specific when you say you can't run it on your computer?
 
The compiler said handle exception: Error while dumping state. If I make mylocate internal subroutine by using contain, I can compile and run it just like the following. It is so weird. Can someone explain this to me? Thanks.

module nrtype
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: SP = KIND(1.0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: DP = KIND(1.0D0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I4B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(9)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I2B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(4)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I1B = SELECTED_INT_KIND(2)
END module

program mainp
use nrtype
implicit none
call xlocate
end program mainp

subroutine xlocate
USE nrtype
! USE nr
IMPLICIT NONE
!INTEGER(I4B), PARAMETER :: n=3
INTEGER(I4B) :: i,j
REAL(DP) :: x
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(4) :: xx
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(2):: xlim,ab
!real(DP), external:: mylocate1
xx=(/1.0_DP,2.0_DP,3.0_DP,4.0_DP/)
x=1.5_DP
CALL mylocate(xx,x,xlim,ab)
write(*,*) ab
!j=mylocate1(xx,x)
!write(*,*) j
Contains
SUBROUTINE mylocate(xx,x,xlim,ab)
USE nrtype
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(2), INTENT(OUT):: xlim, ab
REAL(DP), DIMENSION(:), INTENT(IN) :: xx
REAL(DP), INTENT(IN) :: x
INTEGER(I4B) :: k
INTEGER(I4B) :: n,jl,jm,ju
LOGICAL(I4B) :: ascnd
REAL(DP)::h
n=SIZE(xx)
ascnd = (xx(n) >= xx(1))
jl=0
ju=n+1
DO
IF (ju-jl <= 1) EXIT
jm=(ju+jl)/2
IF (ascnd .EQV. (x >= xx(jm))) THEN
jl=jm
ELSE
ju=jm
END IF
END DO
IF (x == xx(1)) THEN
k=1
ELSE IF (x == xx(n)) THEN
k=n-1
ELSE
k=jl
END IF
h=xx(k+1)-xx(k);

ab(1)=(xx(k+1)-x)/h;
ab(2)=(x-xx(k))/h;

xlim(1)=k;
xlim(2)=k+1;
END SUBROUTINE mylocate

END subroutine xlocate
 
What I would do is put a bunch of WRITE *,* statements in xlocate and mylocate to display the value of variables. (I'm assuming you want to get the code in post 1 to work.) Before you run this code, go through and predict the values of all variables. After that run the code with the WRITE statements, and see if the values displayed match what your hand calculations predicted.
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top