Boolean algebra theorem question

Click For Summary
The Boolean algebra theorem A + notA * B = A + B has been verified using truth tables, but the derivation process is causing confusion. Following the professor's steps leads to a more complex expression rather than simplifying it. The discussion suggests that the derivation can be simplified significantly, proposing that it can be done in just two steps using known identities. The key identities mentioned are X + YZ = (X + Y)(X + Z) and X + X' = 1. The conclusion is that the derivation can be achieved more efficiently without the lengthy process initially attempted.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My book contains this boolean algebra theorem:

A + notA * B = A + B

I have verified the validity of this statement using truth tables, but I find that I am unable to derive it. Our professor gave us a few steps to simplify Boolean expressions:

1) change all variables to their complements
2) change all ORs to ANDS and all ANDS to ORS simultaneously
3) take the complement of the entire expression


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



When I try to follow these steps, here's what happens:

step 1) A + notA * B => notA + A * notB
step 2) notA + A * notB => notA * A + notB
step 3) notA * A + notB +=> not(notA * A + notB)

and then breaking the longest bar using one of DeMorgan's theorems:

not(notA*A+notB) = not(notA*A) * not(notB) = not(0) * B = 1 * B = B

Maybe I'm making this more complicated than it is? What am doing wrong?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No need for all this steps

You can do it in two steps

1) X+YZ = (X+Y)(X+Z)
2) X + X' = 1
 
Greetings to all, I am writing with a question regarding graph generation in LTSpice. I am using LTSpice XVII and am trying to plot AM-AM and AM-PM characterization for a power amplifier, but I haven't been successful yet, likely due to my lack of practice with this specific analysis. I have been using a square wave input at 8.2 MHz as the voltage waveform for my power amplifier. It is said that for a switching amplifier like Class-D, the AM-AM / AM-PM (amplitude-to-amplitude and...
Thread 'How do I determine the resistance for RLC low pass filter?'
Hi, I am trying to build a RLC low pass filter that atenuates the frequency below 4500 Hz. However, I have encountered some problem when choosing the correct R to work with. Here is the Circuit Here is the original sound. Here is my code in Matlab function Vout = myFilterCircuit(Vin,h) n_V = length(Vin); f_7 = 4470;; % Undesired frequency h_7 = h; % delta time % These are for the constant and initialization of the variables t_7 = 0:h_7:(n_V-1)*h_7; % This is the independent variable...