Real and imaginary parts of an expression

AI Thread Summary
To find the real and imaginary parts of the function (x + iy) * Log(a + ib), first apply the logarithmic identity Log(z) = ln|z| + iArg(z). This allows for the separation of the expression into its components. The magnitude |a + ib| can be calculated as sqrt(a^2 + b^2), and the argument Arg(a + ib) is arctan(b/a). By substituting these values into the original expression, the real part can be derived from the product of the real components, while the imaginary part arises from the product of the imaginary components. This method effectively simplifies the extraction of the real and imaginary parts of the given function.
Physicslad78
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
can anyone tell me how to get the real and imaginary parts of the following function :

(x+ i y)* Log( a+i b) where x, y a and b are all real numbers and i =sqrt (-1).

Thanks very much
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Recall that Log(z) = ln|z| + iArg(z). When you write it like that, it is easy to separate the expression into real and imaginary parts.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
288
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top