Is Over 100% Solidity Normal for Wind Turbine Blades Near the Hub?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating turbine design parameters reveals that a solidity exceeding 100% near the hub is not typical, especially for a 6-bladed turbine, which is also unconventional. Most modern horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs) have a solidity of around 10% or less, with a 6-bladed design resulting in higher solidity values. The equations provided for calculating tip speed ratio and local chord length are correct, but hand calculations are recommended to verify results. Expected solidity values should range from approximately 7% to 30%, depending on design specifics. It's essential to consider the relationship between solidity and tip speed ratio for optimal turbine efficiency.
fugg
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm calculating the different parameters of a turbine design but I have some trouble with the solidity. The solidity near the hub exceeds 100%, but is an average of ~27% for a 6 bladed turbine. I'm just wondering if anyone has had experience in turbine design and if +100% solidity is normal (i.e. normal for blades to overlap each other near hub) or not. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have a little experience in wind turbine design, and no a solidity of greater than 100% is not normal. A wind turbine with 6 blades isn't normal either. Solidity over 10% of the entire turbine is relatively uncommon for most modern HAWTs.
 
As the blade count increases, the solidity naturally does too. Sorry it wasn't 27% I was thinking of a different figure, but ~12%, which given that a 3 blade turbine would be ~9% seems reasonable. A 6 bladed turbine is indeed not conventional, but noise and tip speed ratio are my priorities hence the blade count.
I'm attaching an Excel sheet detailing the calculations. Am I missing something very obvious? The following equations were used:

Tip Speed Ratio: λ= ΩR/U, at distance r: λ_r=λ r/R
Angle of relative wind: φ= 2/3 〖tan〗^(-1) 1/λ_r
Local cord length: cl= (8πr/(BC_l ))(1-cosφ)
Optimum solidity for B blade number: σ≅ B/Nπ (N∑(i=1)(cl/R))

N=number of blade sections, 10 in this case.
Doesn't copy very well but you get the idea. I assumed the Coefficient of lift (Cl) to be 1 across the span to make it simple though I don't think it's too much of a stretch?
 

Attachments

Aww, no one has worked in wind turbine design?
 
The equations you have listed are correct. It is easy to check your work, just do a few hand calculations to confirm the equations have been properly entered.

As for the results you should get solidity between ~7% (although single blade designs are even less) and ~30%. To check a specific turbine make sure that in the case of a high solidity the tip speed ratio is low and for low solidity the tip speed ratio is high. There are equations for finding the most efficient ratio, but not all turbines are efficient so use this as a guideline and not a rule. To make this simple I have attached a graph of solidity vs tip speed ratio.



www.charlieseviour.co.uk
 

Attachments

  • tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 780
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top