Eigenvalues of total angular momentum

stefano
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Who knows the formula to calculate the eigenvalues of total angular momentum between two different states? In particular, what is the matrix element of

<S, L, J, M_J | J^2 | S', L', J', M'_J> ?

Thank's...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eh? You've given the states here with j being one of the quantum numbers, which makes the problem trivial. Can you clarify?
 
And so? What is the trivial answer?
 
stefano said:
And so? What is the trivial answer?

J^2 delta_(J,J') delta(s,s') delta(l,l') delta(m,m')

cheers,
Patrick
 
stefano said:
Who knows the formula to calculate the eigenvalues of total angular momentum between two different states? In particular, what is the matrix element of

<S, L, J, M_J | J^2 | S', L', J', M'_J> ?

Thank's...
I don't understand your notation. Your eigenkets should be either

|j_1 j_2; m_1 m_2\rangle

or

|j_1 j_2;j m\rangle

If you're using the second option, the problem is trivial, as Vanesch said, but the eigenvalue of J² is

\hbar^2 j(j+1)

not j².

If you're using the first option, it gets much more complicated. In principle, you can calculate your matrix element if you first expand one of the kets in eigenkets of the second kind. The coefficients of the expansion are called Clebsch-Gordan coefficents.
 
I am agree with you. In fact I made bad the question, because my original problem is that I need to write eigenstate of J for three particles. Then J=j_1+j_2+j_3; to do this I have to fix the projection (for example M=1/2) and the three sets of single particles for which M=1/2 are (5/2,1/2, -5/2), (3/2,1/2, -3/2) and (5/2, -1/2, -3/2) named A, B, C. Now I have to build the matrix U of elements of J, that I arrive at the original question: for example U_12 is <A|J^2|B> where |A> and |B> are
the states written before, but they aren't eigenstates of J^2.
I found a formula that may be mine answer:

<A| J |B> = delta(j_a, j_b)*delta(m_a+-1,m_b)*sqrt ((j_b+-m_b)*(j_b-+j_b+1))

with |a> = !j_a, m_a>
I need to perform all this matrix elements and then I have to diagonalize this matrix to have the three coefficients to combine |A>, |B> and |C>, in order to have eigenstates of J.

Sorry for my first question that was badly formed!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top