
#1
Jul610, 02:52 AM

P: 665

I was just reading a text on QED that equates the vector potential to electrodynamic momentum using the de Broglie relationship.
At a later stage, the current flow in a conductor is predicted by considering the total momentum of the charge in relation to the electrodynamic. Everything works out and it all fits. But when I look at the dimensions, I find that the electrodynamic part has the units of angular momentum. Whereas the total momentum is of course, well, I assume it's momentum. Is this valid? can I simply add angular and linear momentum and equate that total to wavenumber. Or is it that the total momentum being considered in the text is in actual fact the total angular momentum? Presumably the author felt it too obvious to mention? 



#2
Jul610, 06:29 PM

P: 534

How can anyone have a clue how to answer you correctly, AJ, if you haven't given the derivation OR the reference?? ... 



#3
Jul610, 11:39 PM

P: 336

Many texts refer to angular momentum simply as 'momentum'.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Poincare conserved currents : Energymomentum and Angularmomentum tensors  Beyond the Standard Model  10  
Aircraft Carrier  Linear Momentum converted to Angular Momentum and Impact Force  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  0  
Angular momentum and Linear momentum elastic collision  Introductory Physics Homework  6  
angular momentum and linear momentum  Introductory Physics Homework  8  
Angular momentum and orbital angular momentum problems  Introductory Physics Homework  3 