Origin of Cosmic Rays: Intensity Explained

AI Thread Summary
Cosmic rays originate from outer space and enter Earth's atmosphere, with their intensity peaking at approximately 20 km altitude before decreasing at higher elevations. This phenomenon occurs because primary cosmic rays collide with atmospheric atoms, generating secondary cosmic rays, primarily muons, which are detected at lower altitudes. At high altitudes, the sparse molecular concentration leads to fewer collisions and, consequently, a reduced generation of secondary particles. Observational evidence strongly supports that primary cosmic rays do not originate from Earth. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between altitude, molecular concentration, and cosmic ray intensity.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
we all know the cosmic rays comes from outer surface of the Earth from higher altitudes and enter the Earth's atmosphere in all directions. but experimental studies have revealed that intensity of cosmic rays increases with altitude and reaches a maximum at about 20 km above Earth surface and above that altitude , the intensity decreases. cosmic rays, being high energetic, comes from outer surface but its intensity is less at higher altitudes above 20 km. what is the reason for this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Most of the cosmic rays you detect eg. as noise in CCDs are muons created in the atmosphere when higher energy particles form space hit atoms

At low altitudes these secondary muons will have been absorbed by hitting other atoms, at very high altitudes there aren't enough atmospheric atoms to be hit by high energy particles and so fewer muons are generated.
 
Any notion that cosmic rays originate more from Earth than anywhere else seriously conflicts with observational evidence.
 
thanks nobody special for your explanation
 
Just to make Chronos' point clear.
Primary cosmic rays originate in space. When they enter the atmosphere they collide with atoms in the atmosphere and make a whole shower of secondary cosmic rays, it's these secondary rays that you mostly detect and have a characteristic height profile.
 
That's the area of accumulated energy problem.
Actually the cosmic ray intensity is high in the space.
But accumulated amount of the ionized particle is high around ~ 20km altitude.

--- high altitude area very low moleclular concentration, collison possiblity very low
.
.
--- middle altitude area low molecular concentraiton , collision probablity is high
.........(high amount of ionic atoms exist)
.
--- low altitude area very high molecular concentraion, low amount cosmic ray reached from the space
.
That's the amount of accumulated high energy particle problem.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?

Similar threads

Back
Top