Questions on Waves: Answers to 3 Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
AI Thread Summary
When a wave reflects off a surface, its phase can change by either π/2 radians or π radians, depending on the refractive indices of the two media involved. A wave reflecting off a medium with a higher refractive index experiences a phase shift of π radians, while no phase shift occurs when reflecting off a medium with a lower refractive index. For a plane wave reflecting off a perfect mirror, the resulting wave does not cancel itself out, as the phase change does not lead to complete destructive interference. Additionally, a spherical wave transitions to a plane wave as the distance from the source approaches infinity, which can be mathematically shown by examining the wave equations. Internal reflection in water does not change the phase of the wave if it reflects off a boundary with a lower refractive index, leading to confusion about the nature of the reflection occurring at the water/air interface.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
My first question is: When a wave gets reflected over a surface, its phase gets delayed by \frac{\pi}{2} rad or \pi rad, I do not remember. How can I show this? I've access to Hecht's book on Optics but didn't find anything with the change of phase for wave's reflection. If someone could point me the exact page explaining this, I'd be glad. Any website explaining mathematically this is also welcome.

My second question is, if I send a plane wave over a perfect mirror. If the phase of the wave changes by -\pi rad after 1 reflection, the wave will cancel itself?!
I'll have the sum of \vec E (x,t)=\vec E _0 (\omega t - \vec k \vec x)+ \vec E _0 (\omega t -\vec k \vec x - \pi)=\vec E _0 [\cos (\theta )+ \cos (\theta - \pi ) ]=0. It seems obviously wrong, what do I do wrong?

My third question is, how can I show that a spherical wave became a plane wave when r \to \infty? According to http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SphericalWave.html, a spherical wave can be written under the form \frac{\psi _0}{r} \cos (\omega t -kr + \phi) while a plane wave under the form \psi _0 \cos (\omega t -\vec k \cdot \vec r + \phi). So it seems they took the limit when r \to 1?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jtbell said:
For the phase change (among other things):

Reflection at a dielectric boundary

Thanks a lot, it really helped.
I've learned from it that there's a pi rad difference for the reflected wave if it reflexes over a medium with a greater refractive index than the incident one. Also, the refracted wave have no angle delay compared to the incident one. But the surprising thing to me is that the reflected wave doesn't have any phase change if it reflexes over a surface with a lower refractive index than the incident one.
Does that mean that internal reflexion occurring in water doesn't change the phase of the wave? The wave reflects over the surface water/air, but still in water? I'm a bit confused here. Does the wave traveling in water reflexes over water or over air, in case of an internal reflexion?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top