Can Light Cones Determine the Absolute Sequence of Quantum Measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thenewmans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Simultaneity
thenewmans
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
Please tell me if I have this correct. A particle has both a future light cone and a past light cone. In the past is everything that can affect the particle without exceeding Special Relativity. Now let’s say you have 2 entangled particles and you measure them so that each measurement is taken outside of the other particle’s light cones. Determining which measurement was taken first requires a specific inertial frame of reference. If that’s correct then you can’t determine which measurement was taken first absolutely since you can always pick a specific inertial frame of reference which disagrees. (The events don’t require entanglement. I’m just thinking about QM.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your understanding is correct. In order to determine which measurement was taken first, you need to have a specific inertial frame of reference. However, due to the fact that different frames of reference can disagree on the order in which measurements were taken, it is impossible to determine which measurement took place first absolutely.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top