Calculus in Impulse Momentum Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two main inquiries: the use of embedded LaTeX and the calculus behind the impulse momentum theorem. The user seeks guidance on finding a tutorial for embedded LaTeX, as existing resources did not work for them. Additionally, they request clarification on how the integral of dp/dt simplifies to p2 - p1 in the context of the impulse momentum theorem. The response emphasizes that this simplification is a direct application of the fundamental theorem of calculus, which is crucial to grasp. Understanding this theorem is essential for mastering the relationship between impulse and momentum.
elementbrdr
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is my first post. Sorry for the mistakes it certainly contains.

I have two questions. First, is there a tutorial for using embedded LaTex? I found some general tutorials on LaTex, but I couldn't get some of the commands listed in that tutorial to work in the embedded LaTex code block. Second, can someone explain the calculus behind the impulse momentum theorem to me? I understand how to get to I = integral{t1 to t2} dp/dt dt. But I don't understand how that simplifies to p2 - p1. I probably just need to brush up on my integral calculus a bit, but I would appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It goes like this:
I=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}F dt =\int_{t_1}^{t_2}\frac{dp}{dt} dt=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}dp=p(t_2)-p(t_1)=p_2-p_1
 
elementbrdr said:
I understand how to get to I = integral{t1 to t2} dp/dt dt. But I don't understand how that simplifies to p2 - p1.

This is exactly the fundamental theorem of calculus--an important thing to make sure you understand well.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top