Why do galaxies drift apart in the expanding universe?

Hexorg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone.
This is my first post in this forums. I wanted to discuss a few concepts after reading Stephen Hawkin's "The Grand Design" book, and a search engine suggested your forums :)

Particularly, I want to talk about the fact that all the galaxies drift "apart" from each other. I understand how blue-shift and red-shift techniques work, but wouldn't you need to know some other factor as a reference point? In other words, when we observe the star's light, giving of a wavelength, say 580nm (I know starts emit all kinds of wavelength, but just use one for simplicity), how do we know that it's supposed to be smaller then 580nm (blue-shifted) or bigger then 580nm (red-shifted)? We'd have to know the compound of the galaxy to tell the actual spectrum that we'd see from it, wouldn't we?

But setting that aside, and working from the point that universe is expanding. Let's say that space-time = tXYZ (time, and 3 major dimensions). As lim(t) \rightarrow \infty, lim(tXYZ) \rightarrow \infty too, so wouldn't space-time expand just because the time is "running" forward?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The shift is observed by analyzing the lines of the spectrum. Each element (particularly Hydrogen) has a set of lines which are specifically spaced. The spacing tells us what element is responsible and the shift is determined by the shift from the lines for that element from a non-moving source (such as the sun or in a lab on earth).
 
Oh, ok I saw those lines before. So the pattern is set?! I see thanks :D

That leaves the last part of the post though, what you guys think about the tXYZ expanding as t increases?
 
Hexorg said:
Oh, ok I saw those lines before. So the pattern is set?! I see thanks :D

That leaves the last part of the post though, what you guys think about the tXYZ expanding as t increases?

(t,x,y,z) is just a coordinate point in spacetime. If you increase t, it means you move from one spacetime location to another spacetime location with a different t coordinate value.
 
Oh... whops... concept fail.
Thanks :)
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top