Prove by Induction: 3n-1 is Divisible by 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter BloodyFrozen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving by induction that 3n-1 is divisible by 2. The initial base case shows that for n=1, 3^1-1 equals 2, which is divisible by 2. The induction hypothesis is established as 3^n = 2a + 1 for some integer a. By substituting this into the expression for 3^(n+1)-1, it simplifies to 6a + 2, which is clearly divisible by 2. The proof concludes successfully, confirming the statement holds for all n.
BloodyFrozen
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
I was doing this for practice and came across this problem-- I have no clue how to prove it.

By Induction, prove that 3n-1 is divisible by 2.

1) 3-1=2, divisible by two; good so far

Now I have no clue how to approach this.:bugeye:

Please help. Thanks in advance:smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi BloodyFrozen! :smile:

So, the induction hypothesis says that

3^n=2a+1

for some a. Now, try substitute this in 3^{n+1}-1.
 
micromass said:
Hi BloodyFrozen! :smile:

So, the induction hypothesis says that

3^n=2a+1

for some a. Now, try substitute this in 3^{n+1}-1.


What do you mean sustituting it in?
 
BloodyFrozen said:
What do you mean sustituting it in?

3^{n+1}-1=3.3^n-1=3.(2a+1)-1
 
micromass said:
3^{n+1}-1=3.3^n-1=3.(2a+1)-1

Ok.
6a+2=2(3a+1).

Since this is multiplied by 2, it must be divisible by 2.
Thanks again (if you know what I mean ;P) micromass!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top