Rest Frame of a Photon - FAQ by Forum Members

Click For Summary
The concept of a rest frame for a photon is contradictory because it implies the photon is both at rest and moving at the speed of light, which is impossible. In special relativity, light travels at a constant speed (c) in all reference frames, making a rest frame for a photon nonsensical. While a true rest frame cannot exist for light, non-inertial coordinate systems can be used where light rays maintain constant coordinates. Understanding the difference between reference frames and coordinate systems is crucial in this context. Therefore, the discussion emphasizes the incompatibility of a photon's rest frame within the framework of relativity.
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
15,524
Reaction score
769
I've read that in relativity the concept of the rest frame of a photon doesn't make sense. Why is that?

A rest frame of some object is a reference frame in which the object's velocity is zero. One of the key axioms of special relativity is that light moves at c in all reference frames. The rest frame of a photon would require the photon to be at rest (velocity=0) and moving at c (velocity=299792458 m/s). That of course is contradictory. In other words, the concept doesn't make sense.The following forum members have contributed to this FAQ:
D H
Dale
Fredrik
Pallen
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Kyle.Nemeth
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing to add to this is a brief comment that while it is not possible to have a reference frame (tetrad) where light is at rest, it is possible to have a non-inertial coordinate system where some light rays have constant coordinates. Light cone coordinates are one such example. This is one place where it is important to understand the subtle distinction between reference frames (tetrads) and coordinate systems.
 
Last edited:
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...

Similar threads