Rocket Net Force: Understanding Internal & External Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of an idealized rocket emitting exhaust and the relationship between internal and external forces. It emphasizes that while thrust is a constant internal force propelling the rocket, the net external force does not equal thrust, particularly when considering the momentum change of the rocket and exhaust system. The equations presented illustrate how the rocket's acceleration increases over time despite the net force pointing backward when the rocket's speed exceeds the exhaust velocity. There is confusion regarding the correct interpretation of the equations governing rocket motion, particularly the role of the term vdm/dt in calculating net force. The conversation highlights a need for clarity on the dynamics of thrust and momentum in rocketry.
inkliing
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Some of the following is more or less Halliday & Resnick, 4th Ed., section 9.8 (not the whole section and I added a lot):

Assume motion in a stright line. Therefore, for position, velocity, acceleratiom, force, momentum, etc., d/dt|vector|=|d/dt(vector)|. This is not true in general for motion along a curved path. Assume we have an idealized rocket of mass m and speed |v| at time t traveling in the forward direction relative to an inertial reference frame. The rocket then instantaneously begins to emit a constant stream of exhaust in the backwards direction.

let:
F_net_ext = net external force = net force on (rocket + exhaust) = sum of gravity, atmospheric drag, etc.
F_net_r = net force on the rocket
P = momentum of (rocket + exhaust)
p = momentum of rocket
u = velocity of exhaust (as it leaves the rocket) pointing backwards.
v_rel = velocity of exhaust (as it leaves the rocket) relative to rocket = u - v = vector pointing back and is constant for an idealized rocket.
Note F_net_ext, F_net_r, P, p, v, u, v_rel, dv, a, etc. are all vetors. Their lengths are |vector|.

In time interval dt the rocket emits a mass -dm. Note that dm < 0 and |dm/dt| = constant for an idealized rocket = mass flow rate of exhaust backwards from the rocket. So at time t+dt we now have a bit of exhaust of mass -dm moving backwards with velocity u and the rocket, now of mass m+dm, moving forward at velocity v+dv. Note dv clearly points forward: the rocket's acceleration, a, points forward.

(1) F_net__ext = dP/dt = [1/dt)][(m+dm)(v+dv)+(-dm)u - mv] = mdv/dt + vdm/dt - udm/dt (note (dv)dm/dt ->0 in the limit of the derivative)

This equation is standard for rockets. There are generally 2 ways it is rewritten:

(2) F_net_ext = mdv/dt + vdm/dt - udm/dt = dp/dt - udm/dt
(3) F_net_ext = mdv/dt + vdm/dt - udm/dt = mdv/dt - (u-v)dm/dt = ma - (v_rel)dm/dt

F_net_ext is not the force that propels the rocket. The force that propels the rocket is an internal force within the (rocket+exhaust) system. If F_net_ext = 0 then P remains constant but the rocket experiences a thrust which changes its momentum. The change in p in time dt is equal and opposite to the momentum, udm, carried away by the exhaust. for a rocket (u-v)dm/dt = thrust = (v_rel)dm/dt = forward pointing vector since u-v points back and dm/dt < 0. The thrust is the rate at which momentum enters the rocket. For an idealized rocket with constant v_rel and constant dm/dt, the thrust is a constant.

This is pretty much the extent of Halliday & Resnick on this subject, but every time I read it I'm struck by the seeming inconsistency that thrust is clearly constant yet the rate of change of the rocket's momentum, dp/dt, is not.

I hope you won't mind if I walk you thru my reasoning. By (3), F_net_ext=0 implies ma=thrust. thrust is constant and points forward implies ma is therefore a forward pointing constant vector. ma is constant and m is decreasing with time implies |a| is increasing with time. Therefore as long as thrust exits the rocket backwards, then the rocket will not only accelerate in the forward direction, but the rate at which it accelerates increases with time. dm/dt < 0 and v always points forward implies the term vdm/dt is a backwards pointing vector which is not constant but grows in length as v grows. At time t_0 when the exhaust initially begins to flow back from the rocket, u is a backwards pointing vector of length |v_rel| since v=0. u then shrinks in length as the rocket moves faster, but v_rel remains constant. At some point |v| = |v_rel| and u=0, and after this |v| > |v_rel| and u points forward, tho still shorter than v by |v_rel|. By (2), F_net_ext=0 implies dp/dt = udmdt. dm/dt<0 implies the term udm/dt points forward until |v|>|v_rel|, then it points back. Therefore dp/dt points forward and then, after |v|>|v_rel|, dp/dt points back.

This is one of the major counterintuitive things about rockets that confuses me (and presumably most people, unless my calculations are incorrect). When |v|>|v_rel|, dp/dt of the rocket points back, meaning the net force on the rocket (not F_net_ext) points backwards, opposite the forward motion of the rocket. The momentum of the rocket always points forward in this example, but it's getting shorter at the rate of dp/dt, and tho the net force on the rocket points back after |v| exceeds |v_rel|, nevertheless the rocket not only continues to accelerate forward, but the rate of forward acceleration increases with time!

Many books and websites claim that, in the absence of external forces such as gravity, friction, etc., the net force on a rocket is equal to the thrust. I've even seen this on some NASA websites. But the net force on a rocket does not seem to be equal to the thrust. Assuming F_net_ext = 0 then F_net_r = dp/dt = udm/dt by (2) = udm/dt + vdm/dt - vdm/dt = (u-v)dm/dt + vdm/dt = thrust + vdm/dt. So the net force on a rocket, absent external forces, does not seem to be equal to the thrust, but rather equal to the thrust + vdm/dt.

Hopefully, at this point, you're saying to yourself "what's the problem?" If so, then there probably is no problem. But I'm bothered by the equations:

(4) F_net_ext=0 implies F_net_r = thrust + vdm/dt = u dm/dt

Both equations seem counterintuitive even tho I've reasoned thru the details. It bothers me that many books and websites set F_net_r = thrust + external forces and ignore the vdm/dt term. It makes me wonder whether eqn (4) is correct. I haven't found either of the equations (4) in Halliday & Resnick or Marion & Thornotn's Classical Dynamics or Goldstein's Classical Mechanics, but I haven't found anything in those texts that disputes eqns (4) either.

I would like to know if eqns (4) are correct? Is there something simple here that I'm missing? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F_net_r = thrust already takes into account vdm/dt. That is how you calculate the thrust. T=dm/dt*v. Where did you get (u-v)dm/dt?
I'm not familiar with rocketry and most of this, so forgive me if I am asking something stupidly simple.

Edit: If F_net_ext is the drag and such on the rocket, I don't follow where your equations 1-4 come into play, especially if we say F_net_ext = 0. If it is zero, then everything else in the equation is 0 too as well correct?
 
Last edited:
Drakkith said:
F_net_r = thrust already takes into account vdm/dt. That is how you calculate the thrust. T=dm/dt*v.

v is the velocity of the rocket, v_rel is the velocity of the exhaust relative to the rocket. Thrust is not dm/dt*v, rather thrust=(v_rel)dm/dt.

Where did you get (u-v)dm/dt?

u-v=v_rel and (u-v)dm/dt=(v_rel)dm/dt=thrust.

If F_net_ext is the drag and such on the rocket, I don't follow where your equations 1-4 come into play, especially if we say F_net_ext = 0. If it is zero, then everything else in the equation is 0 too as well correct?

F_net_ext=0 implies, by (1), mdv/dt+vdm/dt-udm/dt=0, by (2), dp/dt-udm/dt=0, and by (3), ma-(v_rel)dm/dt=0.
 
Sorry, I wish I could help! I just don't really understand this well enough.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top